Filed under:
- Stream
:format(webp)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/7713885/20130117_mje_bs4_264.0.jpg)
How do we sort out the teams on the cusp of the elite in NCAA women's basketball?
Last week, I started compiling data on a cluster of teams that appeared to be "pretty much interchangeable when it comes to rankings, talent, and what they have to offer" in an attempt to begin sorting them out. Then three of them lost. Nevertheless, the matchups between these three teams is still interesting enough to warrant a discussion about which of these teams has the best shot to make it out of the Sweet 16 in the 2013 NCAA Tournament and play for a shot to go to the Final Four.
-
March 14, 2013
Who deserves the two & three seeds?
While the tournament selection committee will seek to sort things out using RPI, today we'll try to sort out who deserves second and third seeds in terms of which teams best manage their weaknesses.
-
February 6, 2013
SBN NCAA roundtable: Who's best after the elites?
Last week while looking over various women's college basketball ratings, a cluster of teams stood out as particularly difficult to sort out: Cal, Kentucky, Maryland, Penn State, Tennessee.
-
February 6, 2013
Sorting out a group of teams on the cusp of elite
Last week I started compiling data on a cluster of teams that appeared to be "pretty much interchangeable when it comes to rankings, talent, and what they have to offer" in an attempt to begin sorting them out. How would we go about sorting them out?