2012 WNBA Preview: L.A. Sparks Look To Rebound From Disappointing Season

If superstar forward Candace Parker can stay healthy in 2012, the Los Angeles Sparks should improve upon at least one of their weaknesses. Photo by Craig Bennett/112575 Media.

The Los Angeles Sparks began the 2011 season on a high note, essentially picking up from where they left off in August 2010.

Candace Parker was back from injury, the bench was extremely productive in taking out the defending champion Seattle Storm, and they were sharing the ball extremely well even as Parker was looking like an early-season MVP candidate statistically.

Then Parker went down with an injury once again and so began the Sparks' path to a disappointing end to the season.

2011 Team Overview

Click here for an explanation of this framework and here for our statistics glossary.

If you're looking to reduce the Sparks' struggles last season to a single simple explanation - or even a single moment - you could revisit an excruciating first half of a 93-77 loss to the Phoenix Mercury late last season. It only ceased being excruciating in the second half because the outcome of the game ceased to be be in doubt.

After an impressive 12-2 start to the game, the Sparks simply looked disinterested in playing any sort of reasonable defense and began allowing far the Mercury to get uncontested layups and easy second chance opportunities off offensive boards. But the game itself didn't exactly provide much new insight about the Sparks: defense was their problem all season.

eFG% Tov% Oreb% FTR
L.A. Sparks 49.89 18 26.61 25.32
Opponents 49.12 15 32.41 24.53
Weighted Diffs. 8 -19 -24 2

You can see where the defensive struggles showed up in the Sparks' Four Factors numbers: they were the worst defensive rebounding team in the league, which led to allowing opponents the second-most second chance points. They didn't force a lot of turnovers and allowed the second most points off turnovers in the league.

In short, this was a team that was capable of scoring - they had the fourth-best offensive rating in the league last season. The problem was that they threw away possessions more often than their opponents while allowing their opponent far too many opportunities to extend their possessions with offensive rebounds.

Key personnel loss

Wnba_las_pvc_medium

Click the image to see the enlarged version. Shaded portions represent players who departed.

Despite all their defensive struggles, the most significant loss statistically was the departure of Ticha Penicheiro who signed with the Chicago Sky as a free agent. In broad terms, Penicheiro was the third most valuable player to the Sparks' overall statistical production last season in large part because she was responsible for creating so many scoring opportunities while on the floor.

But to be more specific, as a team that struggled so badly with turnovers, Penicheiro was the team's best ball handler in 2011 with a pure point rating of 4.58, among the league's best. In light of Penicheiro's departure, the loss of Noelle Quinn is significant as well - Quinn was the team's second best ball handler with a pure point rating of 2.84. After Penicheiro and Quinn, the next best ball handler on the Sparks was Jenna O'Hea with a pure point rating of 0.13. Everybody else had a negative pure point rating in 2011.

Most significant veteran addition

New Veterans SPI Type Mins/G VCR 4-yr RAPM TS% Tov% Oreb% FT Rt Usg%
Val Added
Nicky Anosike IU 27.16 1.17 >
-1.1 44.38 <
15.72 >
10.56 >
56.01 >
16.12

Alana Beard *
-3.6
Marissa Coleman M 27 0.90 <
-0.1
49.61 =
13.66 >
5.88 <
49.61
17.20
-1.17
Sharnee' Zoll *
-0.2

2011 statistics for new Sparks' veterans.
* Did not play in the WNBA in 2011.

Although the rebounding was clearly the most significant concern last season, the ball handling situation became even more dire with Penicheiro departing. So as much as Alana Beard's signing was significant for her defensive prowess, she also has the capacity to help relieve the pressure on some of the team's ball handlers.

As described at the time of her signing, Beard's numbers with the Washington Mystics suggest that she was asked to carry too heavy a burden as ball handler, scorer, and top defender; the Sparks should be able to find ways to score meaning Beard can really operate within the flow of the offense instead of being the focal point for everything. But with the questions about their point guard situation, they will need multiple players to step up as efficient distributors as they got early last season. And if Beard can even be a moderately efficient ball handler (a pure point rating above zero), the Sparks' ball handling troubles will be considerably mitigated.

Rookie projections

Rookie School S P I Projected WNBA Style
Nneka Ogwumike Stanford 51.9 15.6 73.2 IP
April Sykes Rutgers 85.1 24.8 46.9 S

2010-11 NCAA statistics for Sparks' rookies.

There has been plenty written about Nneka Ogwumike already and you can read more here about her prospects for WNBA success. But third round pick April Sykes might have surprised some people in making the roster ahead of a couple more heralded players.

Coming out of Rutgers, it might be fair to expect that Sykes will help with the Sparks' perimeter defense. But in terms of their other needs - distributors and rebounders - it wasn't immediately clear that Sykes would fit. Sykes was more of a volume scorer in college (27.81%) and an inefficient ball handler (-5.14). To her credit, it's not unusual for high usage college scorers to become more efficient ball handlers in the WNBA; on a team like the Sparks, Sykes probably won't be relied upon quite as heavily as a scorer which means her touches will go down and, with that, her turnover ratio should decline.

But what was a bigger concern was the combination of an unspectacular college 3-point percentage (29.4%) and an extremely low free throw production rate. Sykes' college numbers suggest that she would become a pure scorer in the pros - she's among the top 15% purest scorers to come out for the WNBA Draft since 2008 - and at 6'0" she's in a better position to pull that off than many other college scorers that have attempted to make the transition. The question might be whether a player who produced so little at the free throw line and wasn't that impressive from the 3-point line will be a versatile enough scorer to succeed at the pro level. Moreover, on a team that had a turnover problem and lost their point guard, it's reasonable to wonder whether they can afford to have an inefficient ball handler on the floor.

Preseason highlights

  • Since ball handling is the biggest question for the team as of right now, Sharnee' Zoll's performance in the preseason is noteworthy. Maybe you can dismiss her 6 assists and 0 turnovers (21.05 PPR) in a blowout against Japan, but it's hard to dismiss an 8 assist and 2 turnover performance against the Seattle Storm (13.88 PPR). Even in preseason games with and against odd combinations, that sort of efficiency bodes well for the Sparks' point guard situation during the season.
  • Marissa Coleman was also impressive in the Sparks' game against Seattle, scoring 11 points on 5-for-7 shooting and stronger than normal offensive rebounding (11.08%).

2012 Outlook

Returning SPI Type Mins/G VCR 4-yr RAPM TS% Tov% Oreb% FT Rt Usg% Val Added
Ebony Hoffman IP 22.12 0.92 >
-1.5 52.93 >
15.46 >
7.33 <
20.27 <
18.22 0.13
Jantel Lavender SI 14.75 1.04 >
-0.5 53.23 >
11.34 =
9.01 >
24.45 >
22.28
-0.75
DeLisha Milton-Jones M 26.19 1.01 >
2.2 54.10 >
16.05 <
7.74 >
23.12 <
23.64 -1.59
Candace Parker M 32.63 1.74 >
5.5 59.18 >
9.55 >
4.74 <
38.32 >
25.17 1.71
Kristi Toliver SP 23.56 .94 >
-2.9 55.47 >
13.72 <
2.99 <
18.12 <
24.07 -2.95



Strengths

  • Scoring efficiency: You might notice that the every player except two had an above average scoring efficiency given their style of play. And if Marissa Coleman becomes a more efficient scorer on a team that moves the ball better than the Washington Mystics did last season, she could go from average to above average efficiency. Perhaps the same could be said for Anosike, whose efficiency has declined over the past two seasons: on a team that moves the ball better than the Mystics, perhaps she'll get better scoring opportunities even if her usage rate remains relatively low.
  • Rebounding should improve: It's hard to say whether this will be a "good" rebounding team, but they should improve with the additions of Anosike and Ogwumike (who was a much better college offensive rebounder than Jantel Lavender and should be expected to be a better pro rebounder in the post, even if not exactly the same "position"). And having Candace Parker back will help as well: her low offensive rebounding percentage is a byproduct of how that number is calculated, which involves the proportion of team minutes. Missing half the season skews that a bit and her 8.6 total rebounds per game was a career-low. She can be a better rebounder than she was last season, which will help the Sparks.

Breakout player:

It might seem weird to list Sharnee Zoll as a "breakout" player, but she's been in WNBA training camps before and hasn't made much of an impact. This season, Zoll will have every opportunity in the world to become a solid contributor for the Sparks and her preseason performance - even if those games are meaningless - suggest that she's ready to fill some minutes at point guard.

And again, if the Sparks can distribute ball handling responsibilities between a number of players (Beard, Parker, Kristi Toliver) as they did early last season, Zoll won't need to be the flashy playmaking distributor the Sparks have had previously; the key for a point guard playing with the Sparks this season is that the team could play such that they don't need to rely entirely on the point guard to run their offense. They don't necessarily need a dynamic, high usage distributor; all Zoll might have to be is a low usage initiator that brings the ball up the court and avoids making mistakes.

Will Zoll set the world on fire? Maybe not. But what they need is a serviceable player at point who can get the ball across half court and initiate their offense. Zoll has a chance to do that and be a contributor.

Questions

  • Will they be a more turnover-prone ball handling team with Penicheiro gone? That's very possible. Even if Zoll plays better than some people expect, there is a question about some of the other players. Both DeLisha Milton-Jones and Kristi Toliver were high usage players who turned the ball over last season. Coleman was an above average ball handler for her style of play last season, but only barely. Sykes' college numbers don't suggest an efficient WNBA ball handler. What remains to be seen is how new coach Carol Ross' new system and philosophy influences these turnover rates.
  • How much better will they be defensively? Again, Ross will help answer this question, but so will the additions of Anosike and Beard (even if she has lost a step due to injury). And rookies generally need an adjustment period defensively, but Ogwumike and Sykes will almost certainly end up being better defenders than a few of the veterans on the roster.
  • How will they distribute minutes? What's really unclear for the Sparks is what their rotation will look like. Assuming Parker rebounds better this season, they'll likely have 5 interior-oriented players this season, a couple other perimeter forwards, three wing scorers, and one distributor. Someone is going to be odd woman out in that scenario and the question is who that will be and how it influences their rebounding and defense.



Projection: Playoff contender

The Sparks addressed two of their biggest needs this off-season - defense and rebounding - head on and even if they continue to turn the ball over at a higher rate than their opponents, filling those two big gaps will help them significantly.

For a look at all these statistics for the Sparks, click here.

Click here for an explanation of this framework and here for our statistics glossary.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Swish Appeal

You must be a member of Swish Appeal to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Swish Appeal. You should read them.

Join Swish Appeal

You must be a member of Swish Appeal to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Swish Appeal. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9347_tracker