Shock and Awe
Seattle Storm center Lauren Jackson pretty much summed up the way I felt after their heartbreaking 77-75 loss to the Phoenix Mercury in Game 3 of the Western Conference Semifinals last night.
"It's numb, like the rest of me right now," Jackson said referring to the hip she injured earlier in the season. "My hip is nothing in comparison to how I feel emotionally. I think the same could be said of every one of my teammates."
Thankfully my hip is fine, but numb pretty much captures what I felt otherwise.
Normally after a game that exciting - Storm or otherwise - I have no problem typing something beyond the basic recap. If the words don't come to mind, I've developed all kinds of random tricks and mindgames to start typing. If typing doesn't work, I go old school and pull out a pen and pad of paper. When all else fails, I hope that the numbers might bring some order to my thoughts.
But responding to a game like that is no time for statistics*.
After going through my progressions, I ultimately sat there staring at a sheet of yellow legal paper searching for a reaction - any reaction (Misery? Living Death by ref? The collapse of civilization as Storm fans know it!) - to what I just saw.
Where do you even begin?
Mercury statistical MVP: Penny Taylor grabs a career-high 17 rebounds
I am in awe of Penny Taylor's basketball ability.
I think I've made that point clear before and reiterated it after the Mercury's win in Game 2, but last night's performance was an almost perfect example of why I think Taylor is among the most underappreciated players in the league.
And that's probably the best place to start.
The game-winning sequence seems to encapsulate what Taylor is all about. Taylor neither got the game-winning shot nor an assist - Dupree will justifiably take most of the credit for this win. But everything leading up to that moment was Taylor - creating the missed shot that ended up bouncing to Dupree, the drive that led to the shot, 11 of the Mercury's final 17 points in the 6:38 minutes after Diana Taurasi fouled out in a blaze of F-bombs to even set up a game-winning situation.
When Taurasi fouled out, the Mercury needed someone to pick up the scoring slack and Taylor didn't just fill the gap but went from filling in the blanks for her team as usual as a complementary player to completely taking over the game in a way that we don't have the pleasure of witnessing that often.
Taylor put up numbers that some players would be happy with for a game in the fourth quarter alone.
| Period(s) | FG | FGA | 3p | 3pa | Rebs | Assists | Turnovers | Points |
| 1st-3rd | 2 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 1 | 3 | 8 |
| 4th | 4 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
Comparison of Penny Taylor's production in quarters 1-3 vs. 4 in the Mercury's Game 3 win.
What always stands out about Taylor - and that dominant fourth quarter performance as well - is her ability to do so much at once so efficiency while her team makes it obvious that they're going to go to her on every play. She finished with a game-high 69.64% true shooting percentage at a 21.46% usage rate, which is above her average primarily because of all the possessions she used in that fourth quarter performance. Even in getting 17 rebounds last night as a small forward, it's not exactly like 15 defensive boards are going to make anyone's highlight reel; a 38.75% defensive rebounding percentage might impress statheads, but otherwise, eh.
But even Taylor's own scoring overshadowed a significant contribution she made to the team when they started to gain momentum in the second quarter. When the Mercury went big and sat in a zone that stifled the Storm's offense, Taurasi was tasked with playing point guard, something the Mercury have been reluctant to do.
"We had worked on it maybe two weeks before the season was over," said Gaines. "I said, 'Let's try the big lineup.' Because what happens is it is hard for Diana because I'm asking her to bring the ball up the court, guard the best player, run the team, and score. Some of the other coaches were saying that it was a little bit much for her to do, but I said if we play a zone she should be capable of doing it and that's what we did.
"We went to a big lineup and made them take outside shots. It plays into our style if you shoot outside shots because usually there are long rebounds and we can just go."
While it's certainly true that Taurasi takes on more ball handling responsibility with a lineup of Dupree-Taurasi-Taylor-DeWanna Bonner-Candice Dupree on the floor, it's also worth noting Taylor's role in making that work: Taylor is the most efficient playmaker in the league at small forward and having her on the wing - whether it's Taurasi, Temeka Johnson, or Ketia Swanier running point - puts one more player on the floor who can share that burden of running the team (in fact, if you watch the Mercury closely, most of their plays in a halfcourt set begin with Taylor curling around a down screen to receive the ball at the top of the key and assume the responsibility of running the offense from the "point").
Taylor didn't pick up as many assists in Game Three as she did in Game 2, but a large part of that is that her teammates didn't make shots when she passed to them. But whether she picked up assists for us to measure isn't really the point.
"I tried to be a creator," said Taylor. "Seattle has such a solid defense; it's sometimes tough to crack it off the first play. My thought process was just to draw as much attention as I could. It sort of worked."
Over the course of eight quarters against the same opponent in Games 2 & 3, we've seen Taylor go from pure distributor to rebounder to flat out dominant one-woman wrecking crew. So perhaps I - and others - should stop acting so bewildered about why it's so difficult to appreciate what Taylor does. She truly defies neat categorization; there's no pinning down exactly what Taylor will give her team from game to game or even what the Mercury might need from her game to game.
Taylor is far more defined by the situation instead of her position and most basketball players that grace the court don't have anywhere near the combination of game awareness and skill to do that - that's adaptive expertise beyond what most of us imagine when we speak of "versatility".

I'm sayin' though: Why can't we bring back Lil' Penny for a playoff intro featuring Penny Taylor?
Her fourth quarter performance wasn't the best ever, the Mercury's best ever, or necessarily her individual best ever; it was just a winning fourth quarter.
"I tried to be a creator," she said. "Seattle has such a solid defense; it's sometimes tough to crack it off the first play. My thought process was just to draw as much attention as I could. It sort of worked."
You neither stop Taylor nor do you "hope to contain her"; you "sort of" live with whatever Taylor decides to do. And players that can decide to take over games and do so are special - that's the pinnacle of basketball mastery, regardless of whether she's the marquee player of every broadcast.
Key player: Candice Dupree leads the Mercury with 19 points per game in the series
Obviously, Dupree hit the big game-winner and so she's no small part of the narrative of this game. Similar to Taylor, Dupree is skilled enough to get points in a number of ways within the flow of the game wherever she gets the ball. It's what makes her among the most efficient post players in the game (66.66% true shooting percentage last night) and (again) a player that's easy to forget in the shadow of Taurasi.
So as an "objective" ** basketball fan, I can look back on this game and appreciate the fact that two players who rarely get any attention from media and fans - Dupree didn't even make the All-Star game - stepped up to win a game and force those that slept to pay attention. I can sit back in awe of Taylor displaying all she's capable of in one 40 minute span rather than cobbling together a collection of mental images.
Storm statistical MVP: Sue Bird's heroics fall short
But as a Storm fan, that numbness comes from shock - I'm still stunned the Storm lost that game.
It wasn't so much the blow 18-point first half lead - if you are under the impression that kind of lead is safe in this series, you just haven't been paying attention. The Mercury got the Storm earlier this season and the Storm got the Mercury last season.
What left me so stunned is that I honestly didn't expect a loss going into that game. Maybe that was naive, maybe it was the overconfidence that you develop as a homer fan of a team that has only lost twice in two years at home and beaten the next opponent on the schedule in 11 of the 13 last games, but I'm not sure I ever really entertained losing to the Mercury at home in a physical game as a possibility.
The Storm are supposed to win close games in KeyArena. The Mercury haven't really won anywhere in two years against the Storm until this past weekend (beating the Storm without Lauren Jackson and Tanisha Wright doesn't count, of course).
"Not that we disrespect Phoenix or anybody else in this league, but we didn't expect to be in this situation right now," said Storm coach Brian Agler. "We thought we could win and we did a lot of good things tonight, but sometimes things aren't meant to be. That's sort of how this game was. It wasn't meant to be tonight."
And a lot did go right.
Bird was once again more of a scorer with 22 points and a true shooting percentage of 63.07% with an assist ratio of 14.67%, well below average for a point guard. But to compensate with Bird as more of a scorer, the Storm found someone else to be a distributor. Last night that distributor was Katie Smith from the wing, who had four assists (28.81% assist ratio) and no turnovers for a pure point rating of 8.88 to help offset her 0-for-9 shooting performance. They got a lot of the shots they like to get and they missed.
Key statistic: The Mercury got to the line more than twice as often as the Storm

Photo by Kailas Images.
When the final buzzer sounded, part of me was waiting for someone to blow a whistle, review a play, have a defensive do-over. Something. It wasn't just supposed to end with the Mercury celebrating at center court of KeyArena after a mess of a play in the paint.
When further taken in the context of pre-season expectations, the home court advantage, Bird having a game-high 22 points - including more clutch shots to add to her 2011 highlight reel - it was an absolutely devastating loss to take for a fan.
But I hesitate to focus on the officiating, despite the fact that the Mercury's free throw rate (36.1%) was more than twice that of the Storm's (15.7%).
The Storm had multiple opportunities to make up the two point margin that determined the final result. Aside from the missed layups and inconsistent rebounding effort, they missed nine free throws (55% free throw percentage). It's difficult to win an elimination game like that.
"It wasn't like we were inconsistent, but we dropped off and lost our rhythm - although I will say we made plays down the stretch," said Storm coach Brian Agler. "We had opportunities down the stretch. We had people hit big shots. There were a lot of things tonight that were just uncharacteristic of our team - missing free throws. We'd make plays and we wouldn't convert, whether it be to get back in the offense or whatever it might be."
And I think that's where I have to leave this season, personally - not to diminish the adversity throughout the season that was out of their control, but there were a lot of things throughout the season that were in the Storm's control that they uncharacteristically failed to perform to their own standard. Turnovers, missed layups, settling for jumpers, poor rebounding in stretches during this series and missed free throws last night.
A large part of that is Jackson's health - statistically, 2011 was the least productive season of Jackson's career. She was never really "right" for more than a few games and that visibly hurt the rhythm of the team and what they were able to do. She clearly was laboring throughout this series even after sitting out the last game of the series. Part of it might've been teams getting up a little bit more this season to knock off the champs. Surely someone will pin the blame on Smith given her performance this series, but that's a larger discussion that is either more complicated or less significant.
In the end though, I haven't been a Storm fan long, but I've been a Golden State Warriors fan for a few decades now and I can tell you with some measure of certainty that there is a massive difference in rooting for a team that puts themselves in position to win and loses and a team that loses because they had no business winning, even when the stars align briefly to make You Believe. The latter hurts a lot less game to game because you adjust your expectations accordingly once you start nearing two decades of futility that was only disturbed by a brief glimmer of hope from a post-season mirage. After near two decades of futility though, it becomes agonizing.
In other words, although I can't say exactly what it feels like to stick with a team that either wins a couple of titles or gets ousted in the first round for eight straight years, I can say it's better than the alternative - doing neither.
The Storm had their opportunities to win, for whatever reason they didn't capitalize when it counted, their opponent was literally in the right place at the right time, the better team had to move on and that was the Mercury this week.
And once I started to put aside the shock of it all, it really wasn't hard to just appreciate what a ride that was and sit in awe of what was an absolutely phenomenal performance by one the greatest talents to ever play in the league.
Feats of humanity like that fourth quarter performance are a large part of why we even bother watching sports and if you like the twist of an unsung hero getting a share of the spotlight with the season on the line there's not much more you can ask for from a single game, regardless of the numbness of loss and the lingering question of what might've been had a star player's hip not felt similarly.
Notes:
* I got over that.
** We need not have a discussion of objectivity and the fact that it doesn't exist in sports and probably shouldn't if you're a sentient being watching a sporting event.
48 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Lost it on the free throw line
As a die-hard Storm fan, I have no problem accepting it when another team beats us. But when we lose it for ourselves? That seriously gets under my skin. 9 missed free throws? At least one miss by every single starter? Including 2 missed technical foul shots? Either the Merc got into our heads, or we got into our own heads and just couldn’t get out.
But I love my Storm. And speaking of under-appreciated players…my girl, T. Wright, had a great series. Wish we were playing Thursday, but Phoenix earned their spot in the second round.
Ugh.
"9 missed free throws? At least one miss by every single starter?"
You’re so right: can’t win like that.
But how do you even to explain that? A veteran team that shot 80% for the season playing at home suddenly shoots 55%?
But looking beyond that: 9 second half turnovers, 38.9% 4th quarter shooting, being outrebounded in the 4th 10-8 at home in the 4th against Phoenix? That’s just not a recipe for victory.
They came out so well that you can’t really say they were overconfident, but for some reason they weren’t ready for the Merc’s defensive adjustments.
Twitter: @NateP_SBN.
by Nate Parham on Sep 20, 2011 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions
Seemed they
went w/ a more traditional 2-3 zone and not the normal rover zone…that seemed to be a new twist Corey was saving.
Obviously, if the Storm had shot the ball as well as they did in game 2 (13-22 from three) the zone wouldn’t have worked. The size in the zone also helped and they were ready for Willingham as well and doubled her hard knowing she doesn’t pass well.
Katie Smith is the mystery for me.
1-6 from the line in the fourth quarter compared to 6-6 for Phx was a dagger as well.
Raising Arizona Sports at SB Nation Arizona twitter: @sethpo
by Seth Pollack on Sep 20, 2011 3:51 PM EDT up reply actions
Penny Taylor
I think that was a great way to describe Taylor’s game. She is forever a situational player. She just has the ability to take over when necessary, but seems reluctant to do so.
In a way watching her last night reminded me of Magic Johnson a little. He could do it all and could go for 40 if he needed to. DT and PT are definitely a fun combo to watch.
I've been going
through NBA stats trying to find a player who went 19/17 in the playoffs and wasn’t a power inside player. The list of wing players to do include Michael Jordan, Kevin Durant and Rajon Rondo.
None of them are a good comparison. Bottom line, there’s nothing else like Penny Taylor except maybe one of the greatest point forwards of all time…Larry Bird, but the personalities and roles don’t fit her second fiddle status. She’s more like an offensive version of Scottie Pippen I guess.
Not that comparisons matter.
Raising Arizona Sports at SB Nation Arizona twitter: @sethpo
by Seth Pollack on Sep 20, 2011 12:17 PM EDT up reply actions
"In a way watching her last night reminded me of Magic Johnson a little."
I was trying to figure out where I’d seen someone compare Taylor to Magic. It was Kevin Pelton at Basketball Prospectus:
Penny Taylor, Phoenix: Clyde Drexler, 1992 (94.5), Magic Johnson, Scottie Pippen, Manu Ginobili
A perennially underrated Aussie, Taylor actually inspired this list because of a thread on the RebKell WNBA message boards. Subjectively, I came up with Schrempf as a comparison. As it turns out he’s nowhere close, both because Taylor is playing at a near-MVP level this season and because she’s turned into a top playmaker, ranking sixth in the league in assist rate.
The other comparison that always comes up for me is a healthy Grant Hill at full potential (this being an imagined reality of course since I’d argue we only got four full seasons before the injuries began). Then maybe you could think James Worthy, which doesn’t work…
But Seth is right: comparisons don’t matter; they just illustrate the point that Taylor is indeed a very special basketball player.
Twitter: @NateP_SBN.
Thanks
Grant Hill is a great comparison. I almost forgot about him. I think one of the reasons Taylor is under appreciated is because she rarely draws attention to herself. She lets her play due the talking. And while I am a huge Storm fan, I’m afraid their run is just about over.
Almost the opposite of DT.
by Robert Walker on Sep 20, 2011 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions
"...I’m afraid their run is just about over."
I’ve been trying not to think that today. :)
Twitter: @NateP_SBN.
If I was the Storm GM
Do I realistically think this squad right now is able to win a championship, even with a little luck? I think the answer is yes for next year whether or not Lauren gets suspended for the year because of the Olympics, but at the same time, Lauren’s injury risk is why I would consider moving her given that she probably is a near max player. Health has not been on her side during the WNBA season for the last several years and it is arguably why Seattle couldn’t advance out of the first round the last several years. Given that the team’s 2012 first round pick went to the Mystics (not like it is a high pick anyway), any rebuild would have to start with trades for younger promising players. If I were the GM, which team could I realistically trade Lauren to and get a decent big man back in return, AND keep the championship window open for a longer time? The brutally honest answer is that the Storm’s championship window is shorter with Lauren Jackson than without her if it can trade her away for a younger big man who is all star worthy. Right now, rebuilding through the draft could be very painful and besides the team is capable of winning it anyway, so delay the inevitable.
Seattle fans may debate it to death and want me to burn in hell for saying my last statement, but unless her salary was considerably lower (which it likely isn’t), sometimes a team MUST make the hard move. Though many if not most Storm fans would disagree, I think that Sue Bird is THE franchise player if they had one player who was truly untradeable. Her perimeter and pull up game may be considered a weakness in the short term because she isn’t driving to the hoop aggressively like Diana or Becky do, but it may also lengthen her career since she won’t be banging up on low post players five or six times a game every game.
You're just saying that because...
…you want LJ to go to the Mystics…and nobody loves having oft-injured players on the roster more than the Mystics do. ;)
by Shannon Cotterell on Sep 20, 2011 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
laughing real loud on this one.
If the Mystics re-signed Lang and offered her plus the 1st round pick they have from Seattle for LJ, I would think that the Storm would HAVE to strongly consider making the deal. I don’t think they will do this of course, but the Mystics are dying to make a move to make themselves relevant, and Jackson still has some years left in her, assuming that she doesn’t play overseas in the offseason…. I personally wouldn’t do the deal either because we would be trading a young post for a post who is closer to the end of her career than the beginning. Not to knock on LJ, but that’s the truth.
LJ will be 31 in May and has more mileage than that number suggests
I don’t see how the Storm would be able to get comparable value back for her. It’s better to hang on to her and know that you’re a championship-caliber team when she’s healthy.
by RP_45 on Sep 20, 2011 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I think what the Storm
need more is a young third star to take scoring pressure off Sue and LJ. Swin and Katie just weren’t up to the task in this series.
Raising Arizona Sports at SB Nation Arizona twitter: @sethpo
by Seth Pollack on Sep 20, 2011 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions
But how will the Storm get a young star?
To get great players, you must give up great players. There is no one on that team who is tradeable besides maybe Swin plus more draft picks in order to grab a young promising talent, and this is assuming that Jackson is untradeable.
I'm only a part time GM :)
One name I would look at is Monica Wright…no idea what it takes to get her out of Minnie though. A Rob and a pick?
Raising Arizona Sports at SB Nation Arizona twitter: @sethpo
by Seth Pollack on Sep 20, 2011 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions
Hill is a great comparison
except his game was so much more athletic in his prime and his defense so much more prominent since he’s come to Phx…he’s also not the knock down shooter Taylor is from the perimeter..
One thing you hit on with Penny is her not drawing attention to herself.
Think about the kind of athlete / person it takes to play second fiddle (or even to play at all) with DT. There’s lots of great combinations in the league (Sue and Lauren, Becky and Sofia for example) but DT takes up so much air and ball that playing next to her isn’t nearly as easy. Just ask Cappie.
Raising Arizona Sports at SB Nation Arizona twitter: @sethpo
by Seth Pollack on Sep 20, 2011 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions
i know we all have different tastes
but those strips cut out of the shell remind me hilariously of Clanker’s Cavern in Banjo Kazooie where you have to get through all those grilles in the water

I ball in these, sixty five bucks, it’s hard to find cheap good basketball shoes for women with arch support
Waffles, Digimon...________
STALOCK GET A ROBOT LEG OR SOMETHING AND COME BACK~WE NEED SOME LOCK STOCK STALOCK HERE!!
by YeahTommyB4ZGermansGetThere on Sep 20, 2011 4:10 PM EDT up reply actions
Nice.
Are you saying that $65.00 is or isn’t cheap? For something with decent arch support (and that will be worn a lot), $65 is not bad. Do you have the model name/number handy?
Nike Blue Chip IIs
for women
yeah, i have no complaints about these. Wearing them for 2 years now, they look great. I injured myself all the time with shoes that were inferior.
Waffles, Digimon...________
STALOCK GET A ROBOT LEG OR SOMETHING AND COME BACK~WE NEED SOME LOCK STOCK STALOCK HERE!!
by YeahTommyB4ZGermansGetThere on Sep 20, 2011 5:19 PM EDT up reply actions
haha i was freaking out about the 100 plus price tags of nike basketball shoes i was seeing
can’t spend that on a shoe just yet
Waffles, Digimon...________
STALOCK GET A ROBOT LEG OR SOMETHING AND COME BACK~WE NEED SOME LOCK STOCK STALOCK HERE!!
by YeahTommyB4ZGermansGetThere on Sep 20, 2011 5:21 PM EDT up reply actions
wow
nice game i missed. I looked at the highlights but I know it is not the same. I was too tired believe it or not (this is the person staying up till 4 occaisionally to play Rune Factory 3 and even later to watch a Canadiens-Bruins game beat itself up). I’m so sorry I missed this.
Diana Taurasi is incredible. Did she scream some sort of epithet that had to be blurred out?
Waffles, Digimon...________
STALOCK GET A ROBOT LEG OR SOMETHING AND COME BACK~WE NEED SOME LOCK STOCK STALOCK HERE!!
by YeahTommyB4ZGermansGetThere on Sep 20, 2011 4:00 PM EDT reply actions
many of them
Raising Arizona Sports at SB Nation Arizona twitter: @sethpo
by Seth Pollack on Sep 20, 2011 4:12 PM EDT up reply actions
“How much LONGer must I PUT UP with this STUPID ****ING INCOMPETENCE?!!”
Waffles, Digimon...________
STALOCK GET A ROBOT LEG OR SOMETHING AND COME BACK~WE NEED SOME LOCK STOCK STALOCK HERE!!
by YeahTommyB4ZGermansGetThere on Sep 20, 2011 4:15 PM EDT up reply actions
she is colorful
in her word choice on a regular basis…
Raising Arizona Sports at SB Nation Arizona twitter: @sethpo
by Seth Pollack on Sep 20, 2011 4:36 PM EDT up reply actions
Not trying to start any trouble w/ Seattle fans, but was surprised to see Game 3 attendance “only” 8,689. Phx Game 2 was 9,356
Raising Arizona Sports at SB Nation Arizona twitter: @sethpo
That number
Surprises me…it looked and sounded to be more than that, at least from my view on the couch…
by Jessica Lantz on Sep 20, 2011 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions
Lots of empty seats around the stands when they had crowd shots.
I’m more surprised only 7,023 people showed up in San Antonio. You could tell on TV that place was LOUD.
by Shannon Cotterell on Sep 20, 2011 5:06 PM EDT up reply actions
What doesn't surprise me
is the 7,368 listed on the Indy/NYL box score… that place looked empty :/
by Jessica Lantz on Sep 20, 2011 5:10 PM EDT up reply actions
As a Merc fan
I honestly gave this game up as a loss. Earlier this season, when I heard the Merc and the Storm were playing for home court, I asked my buddy (a Storm fan) whether they’d be merciful and let us have a game at least, win it in three.
I have no idea where game 3’s Mercury team came from. Maybe it’s better if Diana is on the bench? :D?
PS. Lots of ticky-tacky fouls in the game, though. I wasn’t keeping count. Can a more unbiased person tell me whether it was fair or not?
I think it was a fair game. Lots of fouls called on both teams, in particular Seattle but I believe they just didn't adjust to the ref's more vigilant calling of fouls
but even then the Storm should have won that game.
I'd agree
It was as fairly called as most games. Which means, of course there were some wacky calls, but nothing out of the ordinary or overly skewed to one team or the other…
by Jessica Lantz on Sep 21, 2011 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions
It's also worth noting that it was a very physical game (as one might expect from a Game 3...
So the frequency of calls – even if we disagreed with them – were partially the result of that…
Again…still stunned that Phoenix won a physical game with the Storm…in KeyArena.
Twitter: @NateP_SBN.
by Nate Parham on Sep 21, 2011 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions
You could just keep the first part of that sentence.
And it would still be true. :) As much as I love my team, we aren’t very physical as a whole, though we have really tough players.
We used to be full of midgets! Now we have a stick and Nakia Sanford!
I thought
by late in the game both teams were worried about foul trouble and backed off which opened up the game. Both teams matched buckets at that point with the Merc getting the last shot
Raising Arizona Sports at SB Nation Arizona twitter: @sethpo
by Seth Pollack on Sep 21, 2011 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions
I think so too.
That we had no business winning that game. Still blows my mind.
To be honest, though, the W is getting pretty balanced and the luckiest team wins the championships. Gotta be healthy, role players have to step up, everything has to click, get into the playoffs on a late-season surge. So far it’s all pointing towards Minny, but man, Atlanta is playing really well.
by fadeoutin on Sep 21, 2011 11:58 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Pretty balanced, but it's still a team whre the west always wins
unless it’s Detroit, but they’re in the west too, and it’ll only be a couple of years before that team folds.
Tulsa is one
Skylar Diggins away from being good. :) I think?
I don’t actually get why the West always wins. Indiana and Atlanta are perfectly good teams. Seattle was just so dominant last season that no one was going to beat them at all ever.
This could be the year the East wins?
Last year, Seattle was so dominant but I don't think the Storm would have just swept the Liberty, Fever or Mystics
like it did to the Fever.
I dunno.
A fully-healthy Lauren Jackson, an inspired Swin Cash. I mean, Swin is a really, really good player, but I think she had a down year this season. They were pretty much expected to win last season.
This year it’s wide open. And by wide open I am guessing Atlanta or Minny are the favorites, barring Diana Taurasi and/or Tamika Catchings going bonkers.

by 


















