Free Throw Points as a Percentage of Total Points
There's been a lot of talk about how the Atlanta Dream's Angel McCoughtry makes most of her points at the free throw line - when watching games it appears that the announcers keep reminding us of that fact. McCoughtry, like Marynell Meadors, knows that a shot plus a free throw is just as good as a 3-pointer. (Although, perhaps, not a substitute for one.)
I wanted to answer two questions:
1) Was McCoughtry's percentage of total points made from free throws among the highest percentage for all WNBA players?
2) Do players with high percentages of total points made from free throws last longer in the WNBA? My starting hypothesis was that they do not: these players get to the free throw line more often but take a beating while doing so, and clearly such a beating must shorten the career lifespan of such players.
We'll look at the numbers first. In order to remove outliers, we'll limit the sample to players with at least 80 games. Since my data is only from 1997 to 2010, this will eliminate McCoughtry.
Top 11 Players in FT% of Total Points
(minimum 80 games played)
Crystal Kelly 47.89%
Nicky Anosike 37.19%
Monique Currie 34.43%
Ticha Penicheiro 34.40%
Dominique Canty 33.16%
Jamila Wideman 31.38%
Janice Braxton 31.24%
Marlies Askamp 30.58%
Barbara Farris 30.53%
Lindsay Whalen 30.45%
Armintie Price 30.41%
I used the top eleven as opposed to the top ten as this made 30 percent the natural cut-off point. Crystal Kelly - who got cut in training camp by the Liberty this year - was an absolute master at initiating contact to get to the free throw line. Almost one out of every two points she ever scored was made at the stripe. Armintie Price of the Dream is a master of the driver plus foul as well.
Of course, it helps to be a good free throw shooter. Price is the only player that shoots below 68 percent at the line as of the end of 2010. As of 2010, "Half Price" was a career 54.3 percent free throw shooter!
Bottom 9 Players in FT% of Total Points
(minimum 80 games played)
Laurie Koehn 3.05%
Jamie Carey 6.06%
Kelly Mazzante 6.77%
Shanna Crossley 7.24%
Amanda Lassiter 8.38%
Nicky McCrimmon 8.45%
Adrienne Johnson 8.84%
Sidney Spencer 9.66%
Roneeka Hodges 9.98%
Once again, bottom nine vs. bottom ten, because we can make 10 percent the natural cutoff point.
These players all have high ratios of 3PA/FGA, and all shoot better than 32 percent from the free throw line. These players strike me as non-driving, long-range sharpshooters, particularly Mazzante who played briefly with the Dream this year - unfortunately, when she couldn't hit the three with Atlanta her value disappeared.
So where was McCoughtry at the end of 2010? At 25.28 percent. That won't even get her to the Top Ten.
Now for the second question: do players who score a lot of their points as free throws have longer or shorter careers than the players who rarely score at the line? I split the group of 80 game players into a top half and a bottom half (this left me with one odd player, whose totals I included for each group), according to the percentage of shots they made at the free throw line. We'll call them - although this is misleading - "high contact" players and "low contact" players, the "low contact" players being the ones who rarely score points from the charity stripe.
I averaged in two ways: by seasons played (if you play one game in a year, it's counted as a season) and by career minutes.
"high contact": 6.50 seasons/4,329 career minutes
"low contact": 6.36 seasons/3,900 career minutes
Even though the difference in seasons isn't much, the "high contact" players have 10 percent longer careers than the "low contact" ones. My hypothesis was wrong. So why is this the case? It could be that these "high contact" players are exactly what you want in a player - they're playmakers, shot creators, players willing to wiggle through defenses and take contact to make the shot. Whereas at the extreme other end, you're limited to players with one talent only - firing away from the perimeter. Players with only one talent are the ones more likely to be pulled to the bench when that talent isn't going for them.
That's just one hypothesis. But even though Angel McCoughtry's free throw numbers don't make her a unique player, clearly she's in the "high contact" group - and if the numbers above are correct, we should be seeing her in the W until 2015 and beyond if we're lucky.
4 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The high free throw group
is post players, penetrating point guards (who don’t shoot that well from outside) and Armintie Price. The low free throw group looks like all shooting guards.
Where does McCoughtry stand in relation to other players at her position of small forward?
I don’t know that percentage of points is going to be telling because McCoughtry scores so many more points than someone like Crystal Kelly. I’m also a little skeptical of using career measures in the WNBA since so few players have had the chance to go through full careers in the league.
Here’s a look at specifically whether this mattered for guards in the NBA:
http://82games.com/pelton4.htm
Thanks for the detailed reply on this. It appears that there is an increased chance of injury for players who take a lot of free throws, at least from the NBA sample.
You write: “In general, players who get to the free-throw line more often are likely to be better.” I’m wondering if “superstar refereeing” be a factor, i. e. good players are more likely to get the foul call in their favor. Nothing that stats can prove, but an interesting conjecture.

by 
















