Seattle Storm's Loss To Indiana Fever An Example Of Problems Beyond Lauren Jackson's Absence
Performances like the one Seattle Storm point guard Sue Bird had on Tuesday night do a lot to strengthen her argument for WNBA MVP, even in a tough 78-61 loss to the Indiana Fever on the day that long-time teammate Swin Cash was deservedly named Western Conference Player of the Week for last week.
Obviously, Bird's third quarter performance in which she kept the Storm in the game with two timely threes and scored eight of the team's 20 points certainly stands out. But she also made a series of crisp pinpoint passes through Fever defenders on fast breaks that few point guards would have the skill, let alone awareness, to execute. She finished with 21 points including 5-for-6 three point shooting, which was refreshing for a team shooting poorly from beyond the arc.
But despite an outstanding individual performance, the Storm were unable to get a coveted road win. And what the Storm have shown more than anything in their last four games since center Lauren Jackson's injury - which they've split - is that superlative individual performances are not necessarily going to be a recipe for success.
Although it's great to see Bird and Cash turn in such strong performances, what's noteworthy about their two wins (albeit against the 1-9 Tulsa Shock and 2-6 Washington Mystics) is balance. And for those that have watched the Storm closely this season, that has little to nothing to do with Jackson's absence - it's something that has been plaguing them from the beginning of the season.
Storm statistical MVP: Sue Bird accounts for 50% of the Storm's statistical production
Statistics aren't everything, but they certainly help to layout the landscape of a team's season and pinpoint patterns more easily than re-watching game film. Just to put things in perspective, the top individual players on a team account for somewhere around 20% of a team's overall statistical production with center Sylvia Fowles currently leading the league with responsibility for 27.64% of the Chicago Sky's production. But as the Sky are probably well aware, WNBA teams with one player responsible for nearly 30% of their production typically don't fare so well (e.g. 2008 Phoenix Mercury vs. 2007 & 2009).
Against the Los Angeles Sparks - still the Storm's worst loss of the season - Bird accounted for 72% of the Storm's statistical production. In their loss to the Sun last Friday, it was Cash accounting for 36.40% of the team's production in a much closer game, but still one in which Bird, Katie Smith, and Tanisha Wright shot 8-for-24 from the field. The final box was much more balanced in their first game against the Minnesota Lynx, which was a first half disaster, but the fourth quarter was still defined by dominant play by Bird.
In last night's game, Bird accounted for 50% of the Storm's production. Although the Storm's shooting efficiency was above league average for the second consecutive game - they had an effective field goal percentage of 50.86% last night - if you take out BIrd's shooting they shot 18-for-49 overall and had an effective field goal percentage of 40.82%.
Compounding the poor shooting last night was that the Storm weren't attacking the basket the way they did in the previous Mystics game, something embodied by their free throw rate of only 3.4% (they shot 2-for-4 for the game. Another part of the problem for the Storm is that their bench is being consistently outplayed by opponents - last night, the Storm bench was outscored 26-7 and all four of reserve center Ashley Robinson's points came in the first quarter.
However, a much bigger and uncharacteristic problem for Bird and the team was turnovers.
Key statistic: Storm turned the ball over on more than a quarter of their possessions
Katie Smith was the Storm's most efficient ball handler on Tuesday, with 3 assists to 1 turnover (pure point rating of 4.00). Bird had 4 turnovers to her 5 assists (turnover ratio: 21.18%, assist ratio: 26.48%, pure point rating: -1.96) while Wright had 5 turnovers and a game-high 5 assists (assist and turnover ratios of 27.77%, pure point rating: -5.20).
Obviously, you can't blame the starting backcourt alone for the team's for a loss, but in a game in which the Storm turned the ball over 19 times (26.54% of their possessions) it certainly would have helped to have better ball handling from the backcourt, or really any of the starters: Bird's pure point rating was the best among Storm starters.
The Storm were rather uncharacteristically turnover prone, whether it be due to indecision, rushed decisions, trying to squeeze the ball into traffic, or over-dribbling. Getting the ball into the post seemed to cause problems, even if deflected passes didn't turn into turnovers.
Of course, a lot of that is due to the fact that the Fever are just a good defensive team. So another factor was definitely that both Bird and Wright were seeing more traps than usual, which makes sense strategically: 1) if her teammates aren't shooting well, forcing one of them to beat you is a sound plan and 2) without Jackson drawing attention inside, it's easier to turn more attention to Bird. On a number of occasions, ball handling errors or getting into the offense late resulted in empty possessions (this was particularly evident during the second quarter).
The turnover problem is not related solely to missing Jackson though; the Storm weren't exactly a model of exemplary ball control in early losses to the Lynx and Sparks with Jackson. Like the way teams have used zone defense against the Storm, trapping Bird is something they could also see more of and, if so, they'll have to find ways to handle that as a team without committing so many turnovers.
Key player: Tamika Catchings brought an attacking mentality that the Storm lacked
Tamika Catchings' defensive presence didn't exactly help the Storm either. Set aside her game-high 4 first quarter steals because while impressive, the majority of what she does to opponents can't be quantified.
For a team that thrives on rapid rotations, traps, and 3/4 to full court pressure, having a player like Catchings on the floor can be extremely helpful, either as a help defender or off the ball. On some occasions, she looked like she was playing free safety. On the defensive boards, if she wasn't retrieving the ball she was making a play to make sure that a teammate could get it.
But her offense was also particularly valuable for the Fever - while the Storm looked indecisive and tentative at times, Catchings was the exact opposite on most occasions. She didn't have a big game from the free throw line (one of her free throws was on a technical foul shot), but did an excellent job of driving and kicking out in addition to finding scoring opportunities for herself.
In the fourth quarter, the Fever shot 80% from the field and Catchings was a big part of that, both scoring and setting up scoring plays (even without getting an assist).
However, while Catchings has been a MVP candidate in the past because, like Bird, she's accounted for so much of her team's production, the continued development of center Jessica Davenport was vital to beating the Storm.
Fever statistical MVP: Davenport beat the Storm inside and outside
Davenport was another major part of the Fever's fourth quarter effort that put the game away and while she finished with a team-high 15 points, along with 7 rebounds, game-high 4 blocks, and team-high tying 3 assists, how she got her points was more impressive.
She wasn't just scoring from the low post, where she definitely had a size advantage over the Storm frontcourt - it was drives from the wings and low post as well as a few mid-range shots. And with everything else flowing for the Fever, her all-around game was simply too much for a Storm team that is still trying to establish a consistent rhythm.
Could post defense be a problem for the Storm without Jackson? Possibly. But a game like their loss to Indiana shows that the team has problems that were both present with Jackson this season or have little to do with Jackson.
That just wasn't a particularly good basketball performance, by any standard.
Perhaps what's most frustrating is that we're not used to seeing this from this collection of players the Storm have. But the reason to remain optimistic about their improvement is that these are all correctable errors and there's still plenty of time left.
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great Analysis, Boring Subject
Nate, I love your detailed analysis. Nobody does it better. However, I’m bored with the Storm. I don’t see how they can be a serious contender without LJ. In fact, they may not make the playoffs. It’s hard to win night after night depending mainly on Sue Bird and Swin Cash, as the opposing coaches will find a way to make it tougher on them.
Regarding Davenport, you’re right on. She’s the big improvement in Indiana this year, along with the addition of rookie Jeanette Pohlen
Ha - I'm sticking with the Storm regardless though! :)
But trust me, I noticed the same thing even as I was writing this.
They’re not “predictable” (at all…because they’re baffling) but the dominant pattern between wins and losses (balance vs. Bird or Cash) is so strong that there’s not much new. They’re a playoff contender but a title is looking slim. What’s got me is how a team would collectively decline so dramatically…
Anyway, you pretty much summed them up, I appreciate your honesty, and I’m not offended because it’s hard to disagree. :)
The other thing to note about the Fever is how well they handled the ball without their point guard. I do think I got so invested in figuring out the Storm that I just decided not to mention it.. but if you had told me at the beginning of the season that a team led by Erin Phillips and Shannon Bobbitt running point would be more efficient offensively than the Storm with Sue Bird healthy, I might’ve laughed… Indiana is looking to be in great shape, but I have a feeling the East will improve.
SwishAppeal.com for women's basketball...SB Nation Seattle for Seattle sports...and trying to maintain a Golden State of Mind about the Warriors. Twitter: @NateP_SBN.
The worth of LJ
Ok, look. I live in Seattle and I am a Storm fan. But seriously, LJ has got to go. She’s taking the beginning of next year off to play with the Australia national team, as she should. But she’s doing it because it’ll probably be her last Olympics. Which means she’s considering retirement. Take into consideration her physical troubles, i.e. back, achilles, and now hip, I think the Storm would be best served to trade her now for 2-3 younger players.
You're definitely right that retirement is on the horizon
Jackson signed a two-year contract last year…so next year would actually be her last and she’s stated that she wants to finish her career with the Storm:
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/storm/2011322878_storm12.html
Under those circumstances, it’s hard to imagine the Storm trading her or any team compromising their future for what amounts to a half-season Jackson rental.
SwishAppeal.com for women's basketball...SB Nation Seattle for Seattle sports...and trying to maintain a Golden State of Mind about the Warriors. Twitter: @NateP_SBN.
Harsh ;)
I don’t necessarily disagree with you from a business standpoint. LJ’s injury problems have always been an issue, and maybe we all expect her to hang up her shoes a little earlier than most because of that.
But there is no way in hell this franchise is trading Lauren.
Fever basketball
I agree Davenport and Pohlen have made a difference. Swish Appeals grading system on rookie is geared towards all around play vs. A role in helping to team win. Without a doubt three rookies stand out in this area. Adams, Robinson and Pohlen have had the biggest impact of the 11’ rookie class so far. Pohlen guards some of the best opposing players to allow less pressure on Douglas and Catching’s as well as the pg’s. With designated rebounders on the Fever defensively, Pohlen does not need to rebound….on offense it is much the same, with Catchings, Douglas and Davenpoert to follow shots, Pohlen and the point guard need to get back. Without a doubt Pohlen is the among the best in the league at stopping fast break opportunities. A stat that is not measured but a key in winning games. Davenport’s presence down low is allowing Douglas and Pohlen to fire away from the three point line. The Fever continue to play team ball with the absence of their starting point guard by sharing the ball.
Brendt
You're correct about the rookie rankings I do here
I’ve taken the approach of trying to project who will do best long-term (both by end of this season and over the course of a career) based on statistical indicators.
Pohlen actually took a hit in those ratings not for being less of a role player, but for not being as involved offensively as some of the rookies ahead of her. That could very well change – especially with regard to Dunlap – but I think it’s a testament to the strength of this class more than anything else.
Pohlen has played outstanding ball and this summary doesn’t at all do the Fever’s game justice because I was Storm-focused. But I will shed my west coast bias and address the Fever soon because they’re impressive and I think Pohlen is doing a good job.
It’s interesting you mention Pohlen’s defense though too because that’s actually the thing that’s stood out most to me about her Stanford teammate Kayla Pedersen. That says a lot about what makes that program so successful.
SwishAppeal.com for women's basketball...SB Nation Seattle for Seattle sports...and trying to maintain a Golden State of Mind about the Warriors. Twitter: @NateP_SBN.
Thanks for the reply
To add: teams that drafted with a need to fill a spot, like Tulsa who needed to fill two spots at least (wings and a post) will give opportunity to rookies. Last year, Monica Wright had opportunity to show her talents because of injuries on The Lynx. This year do to the draft and a healthy team, Wright a very good player has had to take a back seat to others. I would bet her game is getting better yet statistacly she shows that she is not. If a comparison is done without noting that she is fighting through the “star power” on the team, the reader could believe that her play is changing downward. If Pohlen had gone to Tulsa I believe her stats would be as good in the over game as Pedersen. My reasoning is with the loss of Crosby (?) the hole is there to be filled on the team much like Monica Wright last year. I agree on Dunlop, if a player gets stats off of injury to a player like Langhorne, does the player change as a player? So I watch trends of playing time and how that playing time is against a teams star power vs stickily PT. I tend to think a player that fits a role amongst star power has gained ground on sticking in the wnba. Pedersen is going to stick like Pohlen because of their college background as you mentioned but also because of their basketball IQ and coachable personalities that coaches are looking for. In the class of 11’ I see star power in Moore, Pedersen, Vandersloot, Pohlen, Robinson and Cambiege (if she can hang in there mentally) in the future. Of course free agency makes this all very hard to predict…..
Brendt
Definitely agree
On role players – that’s what VCR is for. :)
BUT what I think you’re hitting on is what stats just cannot capture – intangibles such as defense and how well a player executes a game plan.
That said, you might also note that Pohlen was not on my first list and moved to #7… so it’s quite possible that in a month she moves up more.
If you were to rank the rookies, where would you put her? I think it’s hard to move her into the top 5 over D Robinson, Sloot, and the top four….
SwishAppeal.com for women's basketball...SB Nation Seattle for Seattle sports...and trying to maintain a Golden State of Mind about the Warriors. Twitter: @NateP_SBN.
reply
The placement of Pohlen around 6-7-8 is correct. We agree on rankings against stats. The placement of Pohlen in the area of sixth man is complimentary and correct IMO….. anywhere in the top 12 is a huge accomplishment for the rookie who competes against sophomore and veteran WNBA players. When the Fever coach started Pohlen in the last game due to the injury to Tangela Smith, it was one more confirmation. Smith plays the 4 and Catchings rotated to that position to allow Pohlen to get her first career start. The coach also rotated Davenport into the starting role, which is why I agreed with the first poster.
My take was on “opportunity” with in a “role”…… for instance on a back to back game Pohlen’s minutes went up and ppg went with it. In Phoenix, Douglas gets hurt and Pohlen’s minutes went up as well as ppg — making the most of the opportunity.
Pohlen plays behind Douglas and Catching’s both having All Star seasons so the “opportunity” just is not there….. Pohlen’s natural position is a 2 then a 3 (then a 1)….also Pohlen plays a “role” that gets the ball to those key players—-Catchings-Douglas and post players like Davenport and Sutton Brown. The three point threat is there when Pohlen is on the floor, and Pohlen has played her position in a way that it has become a threat thus far……that allows things to open up. Because Douglas and Pohlen are shooting over 500% the opposing team has to guard them with there best defenders——like Coleman on Pohlen. Davenport now makes hay as a result on the inside only having to deal with Anosikie or the rookie Dunlop without anyone helping or digging on the ball from the outside defender.
You know the Seattle Storm as well as anyone based on what I have read— If Pohlen had been drafted by Seattle, would she be playing or sitting the pine? A tricky question so i will ask, If Pedersen would have been drafted by Seattle and Lauren Jackson was not hurt— would Pedersen be playing or sitting on the pine?
Adams and Robinson have fought through a deep lineup in San Antonio nicely. “Sloot” as you say has done a great job taking on her role and relieving pressure on Prince and getting the ball to Fowels.
Not to be critical but at 6’8" Cambiege should get rebounds and make layups which enhance stats…… honestly does rebounds by 6’ 5" to 6’8" players count that much in the women’s game as stats make them. My take is that rebounds should start counting in the statistics after 3 ………. Same thing for layup buckets by them!
Brendt

by 















