Basketball and Jazz | Wired Science | Wired.com
The basketball-as-jazz comparison is something that just won't go away for reasons that Johan Lehrer of Wired.com described well in today's piece on basketball and jazz. But Lehrer took it a step further, looking at fMRI results, neuroscience and a (small sample) experiment.
Bottom line: both the improvisation of jazz and that of moment-to-moment basketball acts are "instinctual" but not "simple" - they involve cognitive activity that can't simply be taught or scripted, which makes them extremely complex. And, as Nolan Richardson once described at a coaching clinic, attempting to "teach" it and make it something more methodical than improvised can actually stifle one's rebounding ability.
12 months ago
Nate Parham
2 comments
2 recs |
Comments
You could say that about almost any sport.
Every sports team has a foundation of plays/concepts they will do repeatedly. In a jazz band or combo (small group), there will always be some melody that will be the centerpiece of a song. There will also be times when individual players improvise and do their own thing to improve a play. In jazz groups, soloists belt out their solos which showcase their creativity.
But basketball is a sport with the most constant motion, which means they run the most plays, and it also allows for individuals to go solo a bit more than other sports.
Right - so I don't think you could make th analogy with any sport
Basketball definitely has more of a jazz impulse than any other.
I did realize during this year’s NHL playoffs (following the Sharks) that I can get into hockey by thinking of it in basketball terms…similar to how I think basketball fans should be able to get into soccer (my first sport) by the same token. The difference is that basketball highlights the solo dynamic a bit more and has a scoring pace that evokes a different sort of feeling…
SwishAppeal.com for women's basketball...SB Nation Seattle for Seattle sports. Twitter: @NateP_SBN.














