Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing' Set For Sunday

UConn coach Geno Auriemma speaks the truth: "a real spoiled group of fans"


 Maya Moore played her final game at Gampel Pavilion in front of 5,729 fans, the lowest attendance of the year.

On Wednesday, University of Connecticut head coach Geno Auriemma was very vocal in his displeasure of those who decided to - or not to - turn out for the Huskies first and second round games in their own backyard.

Coach Geno Auriemma, disappointed that fewer than 6,000 fans showed up at the 10,000-seat Gampel Pavilion for UConn's second-round win over Purdue on Tuesday, said he will ask athletic director Jeff Hathaway not to bid on hosting the tournament for the next five years.

"I think we have a real spoiled group of fans," Auriemma said.

Pat McKenna, a spokesman for the team, said Wednesday that Auriemma was serious about asking not to host the tournament, but has not yet spoken to Hathaway.

Star-divide

 

Some at UConn are trying to put a positive spin on the low attendance numbers at Gampel over the weekend - ranging from ‘we didn't know there were tickets left' to the economy to oversaturation of the market.

"Of course, you're never really happy unless every ticket is sold," said Mike Enright, UConn's associate athletic director for communications. "We've said all along that no matter what sport you are talking about, times are changing, the economy is different, television coverage is more comprehensive.

"[Falling attendance is] not a problem affecting only UConn. I think what we may be struggling with here is an oversaturation of the market."

John Altavilla of the Hartford Courant has gone a step further in suggesting the problem is that "UConn is taking their fans for granted". Altavilla suggests that the low attendance numbers reflect customer dissatisfaction that UConn is ignoring.

The public is clearly telling UConn and NCAA it will not pay whatever it is being asked to pay to park, watch and buy concessions. That's fairly simple to understand.

UConn can deny it. UConn can keep things the way they are. But UConn would be ignorning the feedback from its customers, if it did. And the customer is always right, unless he is a booster who thinks he knows who the coach should be.

But rather bickering about who's to blame, who's being ungracious and who should or shouldn't be hosting NCAA tournament games, it might be worth redirecting this discussion and actually looking at the numbers. Unfortunately, although the facts should take some of the guesswork out of the story they might also reveal some truths that folks in Storrs probably won't be happy to see.

First, UConn wasn't the only home team to host, so let's take a gander at how the six home teams in the first two rounds fared relative to Huskies in the attendance game.

For these comparisons, UConn will be listed with fellow No. 1 seeds Baylor, Stanford and Tennessee as well as No. 2 Duke and No. 11 Gonzaga. Ohio State also played their games in Columbus, but attendance numbers for their games weren't readily available, hence their absence from the list.

Game-by-game total attendance - NCAA first and second round games:

  • 1. Tennessee vs. Marquette - 9007
  • 2. Baylor vs. West Virginia - 8436
  • 3. Baylor vs. Prairie View A&M - 8368
  • 4. Tennessee vs. Stetson - 7948
  • 5. Stanford vs. UC-Davis - 6515
  • 6. Connecticut vs. Hartford - 6418
  • 7. Stanford vs. St. John's - 5904
  • 8. Gonzaga vs. UCLA - 5804
  • 9. Connecticut vs. Purdue - 5729
  • 10. Gonzaga vs. Iowa - 5632
  • 11. Duke vs. Tennessee-Martin - 4319
  • 12. Duke vs. Marist - 3644

Well, that doesn't make it seem too awful, does it? Middle of the pack, nothing to write home about, but not on the bottom. But as we all know, numbers need context. That context can be seen when you compare these attendance numbers to the regular-season attendance averages. Because after all, wouldn't you expect that an NCAA game would draw as good or better than your run of the mill Tuesday night game during the year?

NCAA attendance vs. regular season attendance (percentage):

  • 1. Gonzaga vs. UCLA - 143.0
  • 2. Gonzaga vs. Iowa - 138.7
  • 3. Stanford vs. UC-Davis - 134.6
  • 4. Stanford vs. St. John's - 122.0
  • 5. Baylor vs. West Virginia - 106.3
  • 6. Baylor vs. Prairie View A&M - 105.5
  • 7. Duke vs. Tennessee-Martin - 82.8
  • 8. Tennessee vs. Marquette - 74.6
  • 9. Connecticut vs. Hartford - 70.7
  • 10. Duke vs. Marist - 69.9
  • 11. Tennessee vs. Stetson - 65.9
  • 12. Connecticut vs. Purdue - 63.1

Perhaps this is what Auriemma is smarting about. Not the exact number, but the comparison to other fanbases. UConn had a middle of the pack raw number, but for a team that averages 9,075 in a 10,027 seat arena (90.5 percent) throughout the season, 63 percent for a tournament game is quite a stark contrast. It's one that would justifiably upset many people and Geno is no exception.

Further supporting Auriemma's disgust, Connecticut's regular season attendance percentage compared to capacity far surpasses each of these other five schools.

Tennessee is the only school that can boast a five-digit average raw attendance: the Lady Vols average 12,069 fans a game, but that's only 55.7 percent of the huge capacity of the Thompson-Boling Arena. UConn's closest competitor is the 77.1 percent of the Farrell Center that the Baylor women occupy on a nightly basis.  

Venue capacity:

  • 1. Thompson-Boling Arena (Tennessee) - 21678
  • 2. Farrell Center (Baylor) - 10284
  • 3. Gampel Pavilion (Connecticut) - 10027
  • 4. Cameron Indoor Stadium (Duke) - 9314
  • 5. Maples Pavilion (Stanford) - 7233
  • 6. McCarthey Athletic Center (Gonzaga) - 6000

So what's to blame now?

Opponents that don't travel the long distances to help fill the arena? Hartford is less than an hour drive from Storrs, but that game only drew a 70.7 percent capacity crowd.

Ticket prices that are regulated by the NCAA? Wouldn't one of the more well off areas in the US be able to handle a $22 ticket to see the golden girl Maya Moore's very last game in Storrs? Connecticut can't be hurting to the extent that $22 plus an apparent $8 parking charge will bust the bank if it's not stopping people in places like Waco, Texas and Spokane, Washington.

A basketball team taking their fans for granted as has been suggested? Or perhaps Geno hit the nail on the head - fans that expect to host, expect to win and don't expect to be called out when they don't show up.

Poll
Who's more spoiled?
UConn fans (as Geno Auriemma says)
12 votes
UConn coach Geno Auriemma (as some media members say)
11 votes
Neither
6 votes
Who cares?
12 votes

41 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 40 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Maybe Geno is laying the groundwork....

…for taking that job at the University of Virginia.

…okay, for those UConn fans that passed out, I was just kidding. Well, a little bit anyway.

by James Bowman on Mar 24, 2011 7:51 AM EDT reply actions  

Now, now

Geno is going to take the Tennessee men’s job

I believe in Rising to the Occasion
I believe in Pushing It
I believe Women are Emotional
I believe Nothing is Out of Reach
I believe in Dreaming Big
I believe in Taking What is Mine
I believe in My Team
I believe We're in this Together

by pilight on Mar 24, 2011 9:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

There is no almost way Geno would leave UConn to go to Tennessee

because of the women’s basketball rivalry, and the fact that the men’s basketball teams are now playing each other annually. There is no doubt why the programs are playing each other, and it’s because the women’s teams aren’t playing.

If Geno took his talents to Knoxville to clean up Bruce Pearl’s mess, it would be the coaches’ equivalent of LeBron going to South Beach.

by thewiz06 on Mar 24, 2011 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks for putting up the numbers.

Just to clarify Knoxville’s percentages: during the NCAA tournament, the upper level is blocked off by black curtains, so Thompson-Boling Arena only holds 12,000ish for the tourney games. That’s how 9,000 gets you 75% in a 21,000+ seat stadium.

by David Hooper on Mar 24, 2011 8:20 AM EDT reply actions  

Thanks for the Tennessee info

Do they put the curtains up during the regular season since the average attendance of a regular season game is 12,069? Or the lower bowl is packed to capacity every night? I guess they never really show too much above the court on any TV shots I see …

by Jessica Lantz on Mar 24, 2011 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

No.

There are several fans who love sitting upper bowl. But we do occasionally get bigger crowds. The Vandy home game had 17k, but that was largely due to having ESPN GameDay in the house. Sometimes teams like Duke and Stanford draw huge numbers (though this year’s Stanford game happened with the school on break).

by David Hooper on Mar 24, 2011 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh boy, do I have some comments...

Jessica, great information, but…

First, there were several tweets from at least Baylor and Tennessee with “first 1,000 students in free tonight”. Are those reflected in the numbers, as they did not happen at Connecticut?

Did you find out ticket prices at other arenas? In the past, I know UConn charged more than any other venue. I would be interested in knowing.

It’s not just $22 + $8 either. Remember you usually go at least two people together, so now you are up to $44 + $8. Now consider the 7 pm start (as opposed to 7:30 regular season) means you usually have to buy food there, at the $4 per hot dog level, so let’s add another $20 for food. So now you are up to $72 for the game.

I’m sorry, but if you think Hartford County is affluent, you are extremely mistaken. Things are tough here, jobs are scarce, and prices are high. We have the highest gas tax in the country. Storrs is nowhere near a city; it takes at least a half hour and a good amount of gas with traffic to get there. So now add in the gas to get there and back.

Now factor in that the game was clearly advertised as being broadcast in its entirety on ESPN the other night. No whip around. It was 100% on for everyone in the area. With an early game time, and let’s face it, an outcome that was never in doubt vs. a non-sexy opponent, to drop around $100 when you can watch it for free in comfort of your living room isn’t particularly appealing to a fixed income audience, which a lot of the Husky fans consists of.

And let’s not overlook the tournament committee’s part in this itself. Think about it for a second. Connecticut’s schedule prior to the Final Four consists of Hartford (no threat at all, series was even cancelled by Hartford this year because it was so one-sided), Purdue or Kansas State (did anyone consider them a threat? I know I didn’t), yet another game vs. Georgetown (already beat twice), and another game vs. Duke (beat by 30). People are expected to get excited for these games? Really???? You’ll have to excuse UConn fans for looking past these.

Now let’s add in the other sport factor. The men’s team went on an amazing Big East tourney run, where a lot of fans went into NYC to go support and see them. Money spent there. Some have continued out west to watch them, money spent there. Football team went out to Arizona for a bowl game. Money spent there.

How much money are people supposed to spend on what? Several more I know bypassed Gampel, and are going to Philly or Indianapolis. Money spent there.

Am I disappointed by the turnout, of course I am. Does Geno as Coach have a right to be pissed off? Absolutely!!! Hey, if we’re going to promote this as “the last home game for the seniors” let’s just blow off But to “threaten” with I’m going to suggest we don’t bid and I’ll play road games instead so there? Well that seems silly. Who’s he hurting? His own team, but he’ll teach the fans!

All I’m saying is this is not such a clearcut argument as “spoiled fans” as it seems to those on the “outside looking in.”

by DishNSwish on Mar 24, 2011 10:51 AM EDT reply actions  

I would like to amend my comment title to...

“Call off the witch hunt for Geno (and me) please” – HAHA

by Jessica Lantz on Mar 24, 2011 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why host?

The reason you want to host is obvious. You don’t want to be the victim of the next Gonzaga.

I believe in Rising to the Occasion
I believe in Pushing It
I believe Women are Emotional
I believe Nothing is Out of Reach
I believe in Dreaming Big
I believe in Taking What is Mine
I believe in My Team
I believe We're in this Together

by pilight on Mar 24, 2011 4:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

You know what would be a lot of fun, though?

Put UConn in Knoxville for opening weekend. It’d be possible if the two are 2/3 or 1/4 seeds.

by David Hooper on Mar 24, 2011 5:06 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Er. Not exactly.

It’d take a 4/5, which is absurdly unlikely. But still. Would be interesting.

by David Hooper on Mar 24, 2011 5:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

"if you think Hartford County is affluent, you are extremely mistaken"

I didn’t know if this was true… so I checked.

She’s definitely not extremely mistaken…

http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/09/09003.html

Hartford County’s 64,000 is well above the national median income of 52,029 and it’s the 3rd wealthiest county in the third wealthiest state in the nation:

http://www.hartfordbusiness.com/article.php?RF_ITEM[]=Article$0@12862;Article
http://money.cnn.com/2010/09/16/news/economy/Americas_wealthiest_states/index.htm

And when you consider that the City of Hartford- one of the least wealthy cities in the nation – is included in that, it seems that Wikipedia is correct in saying, “Hartford is surrounded by wealthier suburbs.” As Jessica linked to, W Hartford is one of the highest earning places in the nation with a per capita income well above national average and has about 3% poverty (nat’l rate around 12)).

Hartford as a whole is nowhere near the top 100 wealthiest counties in the nation, but the City of Hartford probably pulls county averages down as W. Hartford is one of the nation’s wealthiest areas to live. While the nation as a whole is struggling, the Connecticut Economic Digest recently wrote that the recession ended in Conn in Jan 2010. Obviously, that means people are still rebounding, but it would not at all be mistaken to say that there’s a wealthy demographic there and there’s little to suggest that prospective customers in this area of the nation are struggling relative to any other place that hosted a sub-regional.

SwishAppeal.com for women's basketball...SB Nation Seattle for Seattle sports. Twitter: @NateP_SBN.

by Nate Parham on Mar 24, 2011 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well, you can read the articles...

 You are dealing with a limited demographic that supports women’s basketball. To go to a source such as Connecticut Economic Digest and assume you can take that data and extrapolate it into the demographic of women’s basketball fans is not necessarily fair and correct.

The ongoing joke is the senior citizens that go see UConn women play. It’s been that way for years. I would confidently state that is not the same group that you see in the CED talking about our ended recession (which is a crock by the way).

As I stated to Jessica, sometimes it’s not all that you see, and there are multiple facets to every story.

by DishNSwish on Mar 24, 2011 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Understood

But sticking to the original point: Jessica is not mistaken that Hartford County is a very affluent area.

If you don’t but the CED’s argument, which is fine, there’s still the matter of income numbers, poverty rates, and wealth indicators can’t all be lying.

There might be multiple facets to that, but you’ll have a difficult time demonstrating that Hartford Country is not affluent…and it’s certainly not struggling relative to the rest of the nation right now.

SwishAppeal.com for women's basketball...SB Nation Seattle for Seattle sports. Twitter: @NateP_SBN.

by Nate Parham on Mar 24, 2011 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

It was the first 100 students got in free, not the first 1,000.

Believe me, I double-checked before risking not buying a regular ticket. I also got in line early for my student ticket. ;-)

by David Hooper on Mar 24, 2011 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

And Saturday's game had no more than 20 students get free tickets.

We were still on spring break at that time. So the free tickets really don’t impact the numbers in a meaningful way, even if all 100 were counted in the attendance figures.

by David Hooper on Mar 24, 2011 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thank you for the correction!

I appreciate that, and feel better about the attendance numbers being real (not that TBA is ever a place for poor attendance, they do a great job)

by DishNSwish on Mar 24, 2011 4:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Heh. No problem.

I do wish we could get 1,000 students to go. Ordinarily they would have snatched up all 100 in a heartbeat, but that firing of Pearl really shook things up. It was a very odd day on campus.

by David Hooper on Mar 24, 2011 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

A lot of things can come from this:

1. Is Geno wrong in calling out his fans?
Perhaps he could have worded things a little differently, but he has a point. The Huskies averaged 9,075 fans a game at home this season, so for an NCAA tournament game at home, they should’ve averaged that amount at least in his eyes. However, like it has been the last four years, the Huskies dominate against EVERY team not in the Top 10, and yes, the fans assumed they’d make at least the sweet 16, and yes, they assumed the team would make the Final Four at a minimum. The Huskies have played every one of the teams in their bracket in the Philly regional and have beaten ALL OF THEM badly. Sure upsets happen, but Geno’s such a good coach and his players are so good to the point where a bad night for them will still beat every team in the country except for a Top 10 team when they play their best game.

Link to stats
http://www.uconnhuskies.com/sports/w-baskbl/stats/2010-2011/teamcume.html

2. Does the men’s basketball team’s success hurt the women’s basketball team?
As to the fact that fans’ money could be split between the men’s basketball team and the women’s basketball team, I don’t buy that completely. I think I said somewhere that a team’s men’s basketball fanbase isn’t the same as a team’s women’s basketball fanbase, at least at neutral arenas. Most of the UConn women’s fans I know don’t care about the men’s basketball team and in the DC area, I don’t know anyone who likes the UConn men’s team since we have UMD, GTown, Mason, etc. Also ask the students, who do make a considerable portion of the crowd at tourney games. If UConn got in the Final Four for both the men’s and women’s tourneys which has happened twice (2004 and 2009), most of the students would rather see the men than the women if they had the dough to go there, as well as most alumni.

As with the Huskies football team this past year, that could have been a somewhat minor factor as to why the women’s basketball team had bad attendance for their standards in addition to the fact that the team hosts the Big East women’s tourney most years if not every year. At least this is a good problem to have when the football, men’s basketball, and women’s basketball teams are all kicking serious tail in their conferences and getting national respect.

3. Should UConn host less women’s basketball games for the NCAA’s and the Big East?
I agree with Auriemma that they should host less. It gives the team more challenging games, but this also gives other schools an opportunity to “show their stuff” for a lack of better term. For the NCAA’s, maybe UConn could host the women’s tournament, but don’t place UConn at the venue. I would think that a school can request that.

As with the Big East, putting it at Hartford (at the XL Center nonetheless) every year does give the Huskies an unfair advantage every year. Rotate it around at another team’s home arena or a nearby NBA/NHL arena. They could do something like this considering how big the Big East’s geography is:

Year 1: Hartford at XL Center
Year 2: NYC at Madison Square Garden (Home of the Knicks/Rangers/Liberty) or at Barclays Center (when the Nets move across the Hudson)
Year 3: Pittsburgh at the Consol Energy Center (Home of the NHL’s Pittsburgh Penguins)
Year 4: Washington at the Verizon Center (Home of the Wizards/Capitals/Mystics)
Year 5: Indianapolis at Conseco Fieldhouse (home of the Pacers/Fever)
Year 6: Dallas at the American Airlines Center (home of the Mavericks/Stars)/Tampa at St. Pete Times Forum (home of the NHL’s Tampa Bay Lightning) – TCU and USF are outliers of the Big East but still should get an opportunity to host the tournament. You could also add the Bradley Center in Milwaukee since Marquette is there.

4. Do I think this is a sign that Auriemma wants out?
Probably not. But at the same time you can never say never. Debbie Ryan, his mentor left UVA, and I would think that the Cavaliers would do their due diligence and gauge his interest at the women’s job there at a school in a stronger conference, a school which is more academically prestigious than UConn (also a good school in its own right), and it also has better resources than UConn including the local talent base in DC and the arena.

Obviously, there is always a chance that he could take a Division I men’s job, which I think is still possible, but he would never walk across the hallway to replace Calhoun because it wouldn’t look good on his team, and it’s unlikely that he’d go to Tennessee out of respect for UConn. Wouldn’t be surprised to see if OU or NC State give him a call this year about those vacancies and I’m pretty sure men’s programs do contact UConn about permission to speak to Auriemma since there is a clause in his contract about it specifically.

If he still really wants a men’s job and Geno “holds out” another year or two, Georgetown, Indiana, Virginia, and/or Maryland could have men’s basketball vacancies available should the Hoyas continue to disappoint early in the Dance or worse, the Hoosiers don’t appear to have had much progress at all since Crean came to town, the Hoos continue to struggle though there is progress there, and if the Terps continue to disappoint their fans (not to mention Randy Edsall could try to recruit him there). Same thing goes for Pitt possibly…

by thewiz06 on Mar 24, 2011 2:15 PM EDT reply actions  

By the way...let's not forget

I am playing devil’s advocate here!

I do believe there should have been a better turnout, and it is embarrassing to Maya and Lorin that they did not play before a bigger crowd on their final game.

I just think there is a lot of piling on, not by Jessica here specifically, but in general.

It would be nice if ESPN could talk about Gonzaga, Louisville, or one of the upcoming games instead of this garbage.

by DishNSwish on Mar 24, 2011 2:52 PM EDT reply actions  

I guess I'm not alone on part of this, ask the Washington Post

http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/colleges/geno-auriemma-how-to-lose-fans-and-alienate-people/2011/03/24/ABwqNoPB_story.html

So a petulant Auriemma has decided to punish the Storrs unfaithful. Although Connecticut has hosted at least one round of the NCAA tourament since 1989, with the exception of last season, Auriemma said Tuesday night he would ask Athletic Director Jeff Hathaway not to bid to host any tournament games for the next five years.

As threats go, that’s the equivalent of "I’m going to take my ball and go home!" And it’s directed at a group of fans who have shown themselves to be among the most loyal in all of women’s basketball.

It’s also just bad coaching strategy. Because Storrs has proven to have a strong fan base, Connecticut is often awarded tournament games, which are also home games. What coach would willingly give that up?

by DishNSwish on Mar 24, 2011 4:59 PM EDT reply actions  

OK - let's go to historical numbers...

For this decade, hosted tournament games & attendance:
2000-01: vs. Long Island – 10027 (sold out), vs. Colorado State – 10027 (sold out)

2001-02: vs. St. Francis – 10027 (sold out), vs. Iowa – 10027 (sold out)

2002-03: (I am pretty sure these are the contests they hosted. The more you go back, sometimes the harder it is to get info)
vs. Boston University – 8647, vs. TCU – 9181

2003-04: Two rounds of ‘hosting’ –
first in Bridgeport, CT vs. Penn – 9091, vs. Auburn – 9091
then in Hartford vs. UCSB 14253, vs. Penn State 14855

2004-05: (I can’t find numbers this fast)

2005-06: in Bridgeport vs. Duke – 9091, vs. Georgia – 9091

2006-07: in Hartford vs. UMBC – 6824, vs. Wisconsin-Green Bay – 7257

2007-08: in Bridgeport vs. Cornell – 6556, vs. Texas – 6834

2008-09: vs. Virginia Tech – no data, vs. Florida – 8237

The 5729 that showed up to watch UConn play Purdue is quite obviously not on par with normal numbers, not. even. close.
I don’t think anything can take the fall for the discrepancy other than fans that are unwilling to support this years team because they are …. wait for it … spoiled. Spoiled into hosting and spoiled into winning. Those two things should be privileges that this fan base appears to be taking for granted.

by Jessica Lantz on Mar 24, 2011 5:41 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

2003-04

UConn wasn’t the host in 2003-03, the Big East was. When asked how they got around the rule preventing teams from playing on their home court in the regionals, the selection committee chair claimed it wasn’t the Huskies home court even though they played most of their home games there that season.

I believe in Rising to the Occasion
I believe in Pushing It
I believe Women are Emotional
I believe Nothing is Out of Reach
I believe in Dreaming Big
I believe in Taking What is Mine
I believe in My Team
I believe We're in this Together

by pilight on Mar 24, 2011 6:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's tricky!

Thanks for the info – I didn’t realize that; even though I was living up there at the time… very interesting…

by Jessica Lantz on Mar 24, 2011 6:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

"Bad coaching strategy"

That strikes me as an odd statement about a coach that has won 90 straight games… obviously, he not only knows how to win at home or on the road but expects it and perhaps we could assume that as a competitor he even enjoys it…

But this is what actually caught my eye:

It’s not outside the realm of imagination to assume that the Huskies’ fans, like everyone else in the country, thought they would breeze through its first two tournament games…When you support the Connecticut women’s program, it’s not much of a gamble to assume your team is going to make the Final four.

So let me get this right:

1. People who support the UConn program are accustomed to winning.
2. They assume their team will continue to be successful even against a field of the top 64 teams from around the nation.
3. Based on that assumption, they feel that they skip early games and wait for later games.

I totally understand why someone would do that, but isn’t that the type of entitled behavior that is at the core of being “spoiled”?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spoiled_child
(Auriemma is also appears to be claiming that his fans make the type of demands and have the type of tantrums a spoiled child would, which led him to the label…and I admit I found the guest coaching comment hilarious)

If so, doesn’t that only serve to support Auriemma’s point rather than challenging it?

Without even saying whether Auriemma is right or wrong – I just have yet to see a legitimate argument against his claim…and most attempts to challenge him only seem to prove his point.

SwishAppeal.com for women's basketball...SB Nation Seattle for Seattle sports. Twitter: @NateP_SBN.

by Nate Parham on Mar 24, 2011 5:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think he's right on the money,

But if Geno really feels his fanbase is spoiled, he should leave UConn and go to another team which he can build back up with a fanbase that will expect perennial success but isn’t to the point where it’s national title or bust every single year which is what the UConn women’s basketball fanbase seems to expect. I know coaching even a great team isn’t easy, but maybe he needs a new challenge somewhere else.

by thewiz06 on Mar 24, 2011 6:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

I know a lot of us are railing on Auriemma for his comments

but in women’s college basketball, you’re damned if the 1st and 2nd rounds of the NCAA tourney have bad attendance when you host games and a newspaper journalist bashes the teams for it, and you’re damned when the coach publicly displays displeasure at low turnout. Either way they’re gonna get bashed for it.

by thewiz06 on Mar 24, 2011 5:59 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

So much to say, so little time...

I looked up from press row 5 minutes to game time and was shocked at the number of empty seats. It didn’t help that half the teams were gone sending home their fans and allowing others to move down.

I live in Connecticut and gas is $4.00 a gallon. I get it. I also understand that the average person in this state has 3 cars for a 2 driver household. Hard times mean that we vacation on Martha’s Vineyard instead of the Hamptons. We’re spoiled. We’re use to getting our way when we want it. We throw temper tantrums when we don’t get it. Hard times have hit everyone across the country but the prices were reflective of the cost of living in their respective regions.

In Geno’s defense, he was asked a question in the presser and answered. Was he disappointed? Yes. Hell, I was disappointed. These ladies have done everything that was asked from them and more for the last 4 years. They have lost 3 games, had a 90 game winning streak. They deserved a better send off. It didn’t happen. Not exactly the end of the world though. They get to keep playing.

Geno was being part sarcastic and glib in his answers and part this is how I feel. I actually understand his point. The luster of what UConn women’s basketball isn’t what it used to be. I remember in 1995, 2000 and 2004 actually being able to buy t-shirts off of street corners when UConn won Championships people were so excited. Now people read the headlines and go, ‘Good job girls.’ It’s too easy for fans in this state. Everything is spoon fed to them.

There is a lot of money, time, effort and staff that goes into hosting. It’s supposed to be this great honor that you can say this how our state and our fans look at women’s basketball. It didn’t happen. But it isn’t the first time. BET games to non UConn games was pathetic and these are games that people paid money to see and just didn’t go. The same thing happened in November at the World Vision Classic.

Storrs doesn’t help the situation. There is 1.5 ways into the town and 1.5 ways out. But that doesn’t typically stop people from attending

Now onto the Geno thing… Is Geno spoiled? Yeah. But he has the right to be. He built what he has from the ground up. He feels that him and his ladies are being disrespected and under appreciated. His thoughts are we’ll go play in front of someone that will appreciate us. Where he has a point. UConn has sold out other people’s arenas across the country on others wanting to see the ‘circus.’

So take his ball and go home? Sure. But wouldn’t you if you were constantly getting pushed down. “They’ll miss me when they don’t have my ball to play with.”

Follow me for witty commentary on sports, life, and current events.

Twitter: @BuiltByDays

by Holly C. Tanneyhill on Mar 24, 2011 8:00 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

I think the women's team is getting plenty of respect

but Auriemma’s comments like, “We have Diana, and you don’t” or “I root for us to lose every game” while his team is clearly beating every other team by at least 20 pts or more is arrogant and not classy, whether these are sarcastic or not (they all are probably sarcastic). Perhaps the spoiled fans comment is also sarcastic, but either way it’s not classy. John Wooden never would have been this way publicly during his teams’ 80 some game winning streak. Coach K NEVER bashes North Carolina and ridicules other coaches. Pat Summitt doesn’t do that either. That also gives the public a negative view on UConn Women’s Basketball even though it’s respected as the best program in the US. Negative views and respect are two different things.

by thewiz06 on Mar 24, 2011 9:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh and a couple of more things...

1. To those who seriously think that Geno is going anywhere other than a winery in California or a beach in Italy are delusional. He likes his kids, his program, his resources. That’s like selling your dream house because you don’t like that mailman. In all my years of talking to people, I have never met a man that is better with words and getting what he wants out of people with those words than Geno.

2. The BET will not be moved out of CT in the foreseeable future. While talking with BET officials a few weeks ago, they like Hartford. It’s like MSG for the men’s tournament. It has the hotels, venue space, and restaurants that they like. In addition the cost to have this venue is not as much as others. This tournament like most women’s tourney’s lose money. Why lose even more.

3. Geno would love to be sent to Ethiopia for the first round if it allows him to develop an us against them attitude for his team. He could care less about the where it’s the who that worries him.

Follow me for witty commentary on sports, life, and current events.

Twitter: @BuiltByDays

by Holly C. Tanneyhill on Mar 24, 2011 8:14 PM EDT reply actions  

I would agree.

If he leaves UConn, I would expect him to take his place as an ESPN analyst.

by David Hooper on Mar 24, 2011 8:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

If Geno leaves

There’s no way Geno will leave for another WCBB program. If he does bolt, it will be for a men’s job or for the WNBA. And there’s really no chance that he’ll leave unless and until he has more national championships than Pat Summitt.

I believe in Rising to the Occasion
I believe in Pushing It
I believe Women are Emotional
I believe Nothing is Out of Reach
I believe in Dreaming Big
I believe in Taking What is Mine
I believe in My Team
I believe We're in this Together

by pilight on Mar 24, 2011 9:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, this.

While I understand the financial burden people take when planning for Philly or Indianapolis, that’s exactly the point. You think Gonzaga fans felt like they could coast through the first two and just show up later? Geno’s a wiseass about it and obviously he ruffles feathers, but I think he’s right. As for not hosting, if people aren’t gonna show up, why not? Then everybody in CT gets to watch the games in the comfort of their home with ESPN HD. ;)

by ChungD on Mar 24, 2011 8:50 PM EDT reply actions  

Any chance Geno watched the Huskies' thrilling win over SDSU?

Kemba Walker is the man!

Sorry to go off topic, but if he keeps this up, UConn could win the Championship!

by thewiz06 on Mar 24, 2011 9:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Geno might be right, but his job is to win games, not spout off to the media about fans. But I guess spouting off is something he enjoys.

The #1 greatest threat to America: BEARS

by norcalnick on Mar 25, 2011 1:19 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Passionate basketball fans honoring the beauty and skill of the game.

Facebook badge

SBN Women's College Basketball Blogroll

ACC

Blogger So Dear (Wake Forest)

Streaking the Lawn (Virginia)

Big 12

Crimson and Cream Machine (Oklahoma)

Double T Nation (Texas Tech)

I Am The 12th Man (Texas A&M)

Big East:

Anonymous Eagle  (Marquette)

The UConn Blog

Big Ten

Black Heart Gold Pants (Iowa)

Hammer & Rails (Purdue)

Sippin' On Purple (Northwestern)

MAC:

Hustle Belt (conference blog)

Pac-12

Bruins Nation (UCLA)

Building the Dam (Oregon St)

California Golden Blogs (Cal)

Rule of Tree (Stanford)

SEC

Rocky Top Talk (Tennessee)

 


Managers

Natehead_small Nate Parham

Seth_twitter_pic_4_small Seth Pollack

Reffeet_small Jessica Lantz

Editors

Background2_small Queenie

Bowtie_001_small James Bowman

Authors

Maya_small Scotter

Reunion_crop_small Holly C. Tanneyhill

Small M Robinson

Small Ray Floriani