2010 WNBA Awards: The "Obvious" Ones
I'm going to abstain from making any further public comment about the MVP race until the season is complete.
That might seem silly given that there's only a day left, but how this final day shakes out might have an influence on how I think about that award. The fact is that by any reasonable notion of "value" the pool has expanded to four -- not contracted -- and Seattle Storm center Lauren Jackson is not necessarily the obvious choice that some people would like to believe she is. That's not a slight against Jackson but respecting the fact that a number of players have performed quite well and deserve consideration despite the fact that Jackson has had an outstanding season.
So while I continue to waffle on the MVP, here are the rest of the awards which are far more obvious at this point in the season.
All-WNBA First Team: The fifth spot is the only one in question
G- Sue Bird, Seattle Storm
G- Cappie Pondexter, New York Liberty
F- Tamika Catchings, Indiana Fever
C - Sylvia Fowles, Chicago Sky
Too good to be confined by positionality - Lauren Jackson, Seattle Storm
In my opinion, there's really only one spot up for grabs here and that is the one Bird occupies -- there are at least five players with a strong statistical argument for having that spot over Bird. However, where Bird gets the nod is that she is by far the best point guard in the game this year.
The other four are non-negotiable as far as I'm concerned.
Sixth Woman of the Year: DeWanna Bonner, Phoenix Mercury
A few weeks ago this seemed ridiculously obvious -- there really wasn't anyone close. Then a few things changed.
Epiphanny Prince got more productive as Bonner's production fell off a bit. And that Plenette Pierson has been both productive off the bench and managed to maintain a positive plus/minus is quite impressive.
However, without going into a deep analysis of why Bonner gets the award, a large part of it the versatility she brings off the bench. Against the Storm alone, she's able to put full court pressure on Sue Bird in their last game in Seattle, she had three blocks against the Storm last night, and as she continues to extend the range on her jumpshot she's becoming harder and harder to guard. What makes her the best bench player in the league is that she causes matchup problems rather than just filling a role as the other candidates do so productively.
Other candidates: Epiphanny Prince, Plenette Pierson, Charde Houston, Sandrine Gruda
Most Improved Player: Leilani Mitchell, New York Liberty
Loved LJRotter's piece on Monique Currie. But it's still Leilani Mitchell for MIP. The reason why Fowles absolutely has to be All-WNBA: she's a legitimate candidate for MIP and MVP. Nobody should penalize her for the fact that the Sky didn't make the playoffs.
Rookie of the Year: Tina Charles, Connecticut Sun
This is so clear that instead of making arguments for Charles, I invite you to present arguments against her.
All-Rookie Team
Charles
Prince, Chicago Sky
Kelsey Griffin, Connecticut Sun
Kalana Greene, New York Liberty
Jana Vesela, Seattle Storm
Had Natasha Lacy stayed with the Shock, she'd have a strong argument for making this team over Greene and/or Vesela. In fact, statistically, as it stands she still does.
What will be interesting is if voters recognize just how good Vesela has been because she spent the beginning of the season on the bench behind one of the most productiive starting fives in WNBA history, not to mention two veterans coming off the bench. She is definitely a part of the rotation now and clearly more comfortable with the WNBA style of play.
So the only thing that makes this team obvious is that I'd say that this group of 5 (or 6) has remained pretty stable since mid-season.
For more on Vesela: The Quiet Emergence Of Storm Rookie Jana Vesela.
The other awards that are not as clear:
- MVP: please see the statement above about there being four non-negotiable players for All-WNBA honors
- Coach of the Year: Possibly because I've been covering the Storm this year, I would lean strongly toward Storm coach Brian Agler. But if New York or Washington wins the Eastern Conference -- especially Washington -- I would certainly be open to changing my mind.
- All-WNBA Second Team: After those four non-negotiables for the first team, I have a list of 10 players deserving of consideration for All-League honors. I would say that Diana Taurasi and Penny Taylor are locks. Crystal Langhorne deserves a spot for Washington's success. Charles has simply been outstanding as a rookie. Then it gets really murky. Candice Dupree (outstanding July), Angel McCoughtry (among the league's most dynamic scorers), Sancho Lyttle (excellent interior player), and Lindsay Whalen (among the best at her position) could all make a claim to a spot on the team, perhaps over some of the aforementioned players.
- Defensive awards: All-Defensive team has three easy ones: Catchings, Fowles, Jackson. But defensive player of the year? That's a bit tougher. It could simply go to the MVP runner-up.
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
MVP is a three player race
Fowles is a non-starter in the MVP discussion because she plays for a last place team. This isn’t baseball, the MVP award isn’t going to a player who doesn’t take her team somewhere.
I understand the reasoning...
…and would agree if she didn’t carry that team to the extent that she did on both sides of the ball.
I think it’s a very strange and inconsistent definition of “value” to leave her out because she got so little support from her team. But I know I’m in the minority on that.
SwishAppeal.com for women's basketball...SB Nation Seattle for Seattle sports. Twitter: @QMcCall3.
I'd love to see Vesela on the All-Rookie Team, but
remembering how Montgomery and Coleman got voted instead of Jekabsone-Zogota last year (both of them were worse in every statistical category), I think the voters aren’t exactly fond of international veterans as rookies.
This is an interesting point.
I think part of AJZ’s issue last year was that she also didn’t play the full season.
But I also think that part of it is visibility — perhaps to a lesser extent than the NBA, the players who play here in college and get drafted highly are the players that people tend to watch more closely. Vesela was probably less visible than AJZ entering the league and then sitting on the bench early didn’t help her cause.
My guess is that Monica Wright will make the All-Rookie team and with her second half performance, I’d say she deserves that consideration. She has a lot of potential, but I think if the award is based on this season and not a future that hasn’t happened, Vesela was a much more efficient and productive player in the minutes she got and would clearly have earned more recognition had she been on another team.
SwishAppeal.com for women's basketball...SB Nation Seattle for Seattle sports. Twitter: @QMcCall3.
I think your poll speaks for itself. LJ dominated the league this year. 5 player of the week awards, and 3 consecutive player of the month awards prove it. LJ was a threat at both ends of the court, and while the same can be said for Tamika Catchings, she did not have the consistency throughout the season. Catchings really only put up big numbers after the all star break, same with Pondexter.
Some say LJ has the team around her to get the numbers, but in games where the win was on the line (3OT against Phoneix, 31points against Sun etc) LJ single handedly sparked the comeback or got the Storm over the line against quality opposition, often while being double teamed. You could also argue that with such quality around her, her numbers could be lower as she doesn’t need to dominate, she has the support, but the fact is, she still does dominate games and is clearly a step above many players in the league. Her consistent season speaks for iteself, LJ started the season with 23pts, 10rbs, 2 stls & 3 blks and ended it with 21pts, 6rbs, 2stls & 1blk, with consistency in between. The Storm have the best record because of their players and LJ clearly is the Storm and League 2010 MVP.
All great points
I think the key thing is that the other candidates deserve more consideration than to state that LJ is the clear/obvious MVP.
With Cappie, her second half of the season has indeed been enough to put her easily within the group of frontrunners — she’s just been absurdly dominant in that time. So while it wasn’t a whole season, her second half was good enough such that her final overall production is such that she put together one of the four best seasons in the league by far.
With Catchings, the issue remains contribution to the team not whether she’s a better player than LJ — she has pretty objectively done more for her team overall.
I think Fowles’ team’s success make her argument considerably weaker than others, but to leave her out of the conversation is a bit extreme for the same reason that people believe Catchings is a candidate.
SwishAppeal.com for women's basketball...SB Nation Seattle for Seattle sports. Twitter: @QMcCall3.
I didn’t include Fowles because I have only seen her play a couple of times and I wasn’t impressed (but it could have been only those games she didn’t stand out). I honestly wouldn’t know her stats.
Pondexter would be a lock if the MVP was decided only on the second half of the season, as LJ would be a lock for the first half of the season, however the MVP is supposed to take into consideration all 34 games. I also feel Pondexter let her team down on occassions. The phoneix game where she got ejected, NY were right in that game until she was out, and her actions were unsportsman like. There is no way she was going for the ball. While I appreciate the stats she has put up, and no doubt her run of form is what got NY comfortably into the playoffs instead of battling for a spot, I don’t rate her start to the season, nor her attitude as being worthy of the MVP. You could also argue that her run of form came against a lot of teams ranked lower then NY in the standings, their only game against Seattle (a loss) was without LJ and 7/18 games against teams not featuring in the finals.
As for Catchings, she could be one of the great players who is destined to finish second in individual awards. Again the consistency was more apparent in the second half of the season, and unlike LJ who managed to get Seattle over the line in close games, Catchings hasn’t been able to do that. Maybe its because she doesn’t have the support of a great team around her and that is the difference, but some of those games Seattle weren’t playing great, and LJ got them over the line. Until they stumbled towards the end of the season, majority thought Indiana would take the East again, you can’t do that on the back of one player. I would love to see Catchings right up there in the MVP Standings, I just don’t think she is the deservered winner.
I agree with you 100% that the other candidates deserve consideration, however I think there would be surprise if someone other then LJ got the MVP. These types of awards are always tough and there have been some great individual performers over this season. If LJ hadn’t missed the game after the all star break with concussion and continued her incredible form in that stretch with another big numbers game, and hadn’t rested at the end of the season, continuing to put up more consistent numbers, I wonder if that would have been the difference with some questioning where she stood in the MVP race.

by 
















