Statistical Summary of the Storm's Milestone Victory: A Balanced Summary Of A Balanced Team
For a summary of the game, check SBN Seattle's storystream of the Storm's 75-59 win over the Shock.
In the spirit of the Seattle Storm's balance and emphasis on taking things one game at a time, a full analysis of the game might look a bit beyond guard Svetlana Abrosimova's two minutes of hot shooting and look at the many other contributions Storm players made.
Of course, Abrosimova's shooting was critical to the Storm's victory -- it not only exposed a soft spot in the Shock's defensive rotations but also forced them to adjust in ways that left other people open. However, perhaps the hot shooting in the third quarter from the Shock's Shanna Crossley is instructive to make this point -- Crossley also had a two-minute stretch of hot shooting hitting three 3-pointers, tossing a long one in for the third. But unfortunately, the Shock didn't get enough from the rest of the roster as they shot only 1-9 in the third quarter and had a turnover percentage of 38.88%.
In other words, even when it feels viscerally that spurt changed the tone of the game, it's a 40 minute game that is rarely won by one player. While statistics do sometimes lie, they also bring balance to the emotional responses we have to specific plays or players that make them stand out and perhaps help us see something that we missed...or reinforce what we might have believed to be true.
That said, it's not like the Storm's statistical MVP was surprising.
Storm statistical MVP: Lauren Jackson
Since Jackson always downplays her achievements, last time she had an impressive statistical performance, I went the route of critiquing her. Last night, it's hard to really find a way to do that.
Even the one thing that might stand out -- newly acquired Shock center Nicole Ohlde scored 4 quick points early on while defended by Jackson -- could be explained by more than a simple lapse by Jackson.
"It was not Lauren -- she could maybe have done a better job -- but it was a team concept thing," said Storm coach Brian Agler. "And if we go back to talking about those 34 points that they had at halftime where they had 11 off second chance and 13 off turnovers. Well they also had three layups where we let them play one-on-one against us -- we had no one there to help. And we're not going to be a very good defensive team if it's just a one-on-one game -- we have to do it with five against five."
So if there's no defensive critique, perhaps you could really stretch it and comment on a slow start from Jackson -- she was 1-4 in the first quarter and got her points from the free throw line.
"They played a lot of zone and we didn't really execute real well," said Agler. "But I thought Lauren rebounded well early in the game. She got a lot of opportunities there, but I don't think we were running great offense at that time. I thought we got better and the ball movement was better as the game went on."
So really all we can say is that Jackson played well and the Shock had no answer for her.
Shock statistical MVP: Shanna Crossley
As usual, the third quarter was absolutely dreadful for the Shock and the only reason it doesn't show up more prominently in the score is because of three 3 pointers from Crossley. The problem is that as a shooter, Crossley didn't contribute much else and neither did the team: Crossley and Amber Holt accounted for 69.5% of the team's total production, perhaps reinforcing Richardson's reasoning that he rotates players in an out so much because there's not a whole lot of difference between his first and second team and either is capable of producing an "L".
Storm key player: Le'coe Willingham
The Shock were simply overwhelmed inside and during that stretch of time when Abrosimova was hot, Willingham was helping her do some damage -- she controlled the defensive glass with 3 defensive rebounds during 4 second quarter minutes, had a block, and a put back off an offensive rebound. When you talk about balance for the Storm this year, the bench contributions of both Abrosimova and Willingham (and increasingly Jana Vesela) are a large part of that equation.
Key Stat: Effective field goal percentage
Richardson began the second quarter with the following unusual lineup: Chante Black- Nicole Ohlde-Tiffany Jackson-Scholanda Robinson-Ivory Latta. After being beaten on the offensive boards 66.7% to 33.3%, that made some sense.
"The three biggest players I have were all on the floor at the start of the second half so we could get some rebounds or try," said Richardson. "It was just no contest on the boards. They had almost double the amount of rebounds we did. Of course, some of those rebounds were one possession six boards, one possession five boards."
Nevertheless, what might stand out as odd about the Storm beating the Shock so badly on the boards last night is that they didn't in fact score many second chance points -- the Shock actually one that battle 13 to 8 and the Storm were 2-for-12 on second chance opportunities. So although statistically the offensive rebounding differential was as important as the Storm's shooting, that they didn't actually convert those second chance opportunities into points makes their overall shooting quite a bit more important.
"The Storm started making shots," said Richardson. "They shot 50 percent from the three-point line in the first half – deep shots, out of the corners they were making them."
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Best ever?
Is it time to start discussing this Storm team in the same breath as the Comets, Sparks and Shock teams of days gone by?
The bench has made this team so much more effective. Coach Agler still doesn’t give enough minutes IMO to them, but they have clearly taken some of the load off Bird, LJ, Cash and the other starters.
You add to those stars the contributions of “know your role players” like Wright and Little, and you have an incredible team.
crossley would be great on the storm
The only thing that kept Tulsa from losing by 30+ last night was Shanna Crossley. It wasn’t just her 3 pointers, either. She was dominant most the time she had the ball. The problem with the Shock is that they don’t operate in their half court sets effectively enough, and Shanna is limited in her touches. Which, seems obsurd. If it were me, she would shoot the ball 20-25 times a game. They still would get beat. But, at least I like my chances with her being the focal point of their offense. Now, having said that, God I’m just salivating at the idea of our second unit (Seattle’s) being run by her. Svet had a great game. And as long as she continues to shoot like that, we will win the Championship anyway. However, both last year’s finals participants (Indiana and Phoenix) make me nervous. And with good reason: they both shoot the 3 ball extremely well. And although we have had our moments there, when we go cold those teams can beat us. Adding a player like Crossley would give Seattle more stability on the second unit, and a legitimate 9 player rotation. This would improve the Storm’s dominance exponentially (if you can imagine us being any more dominant) and provide an answer from a specialist’s perspective if we run into a hot shooting 3 point team in the playoffs and we’re not as sharp. Allison Lacey clearly isn’t ready to compete at that level. And that’s the only area of the Storm’s game that could be improved. So, I say trade for Shanna Crossley. A lotta wins in the reg season won’t mean jack if we don’t win it all. In fact, it will hurt even more. We do look good. Don’t get me wrong. But, we’re capable of being beaten by a good team in a short series.
by timthehammerrichardson on Jul 26, 2010 5:18 PM EDT reply actions
"Adding a player like Crossley would give Seattle more stability on the second unit, and a legitimate 9 player rotation."
I too like Crossley and also think she’s been a solid ball handler for Tulsa, though dominant might be a stretch…
And I think adding another three point shooter could be interesting — they call Crossley “Layup” down in Tulsa because she’s such a deadly three point shooter…
But as of right now, the Storm is 2nd in the league in 3pt%…and 5th in opponent 3pt%…so it doesn’t stand out as a need…
Going after Crossley would seem like pure greed to me… which you’re certainly entitled too. :)
SwishAppeal.com for women's basketball...SB Nation Seattle for Seattle sports. Twitter: @QMcCall3.
I want a Seattle Dynasty
All those things are true. However, I look at the games that Seattle naerly lost, and I want to be more secure. Too many OT games. Too many times being down by double digits only to have Sue and Lauren turn it on late. I not only wanna win every game, I wanna win every game by 20. We’ve gone into the playoffs every year thinking we were good, only to walk off the court after it was all said and done: disappointed. I’m pretty sure we have a real good shot this time. But, Crossley makes us 1st in the league in 3’s. 1st in a lot of other areas, too. Not just this year, but for the remainder of Sue’s and Lauren’s time here. Houston had the first dynasty. Seattle has the core to have the second. But, that of course, would mean bolstering the 2nd unit; hence: Shanna.
by timthehammerrichardson on Jul 26, 2010 9:09 PM EDT reply actions
All I want you to do...
…is say: “Yes, I’m just greedy.” :)
No judgment at all — that’s what fandom is all about (ask Miami Heat fans). :)
SwishAppeal.com for women's basketball...SB Nation Seattle for Seattle sports. Twitter: @QMcCall3.
Yes, I am greedy...but selfish is more like it...
Because I love Shanna and Sue and I just want to see them play on the same team. Imagine how many more assists Sue would average per game setting Shanna up for all those threes. And imagine how may threes Shanna will be canning getting picture perfect set-ups from the best point guard in the world.
by timthehammerrichardson on Jul 27, 2010 12:07 AM EDT reply actions
Agreed :)
SwishAppeal.com for women's basketball...SB Nation Seattle for Seattle sports. Twitter: @QMcCall3.
by Nate Parham on Jul 27, 2010 12:20 AM EDT up reply actions

by 















