Phoenix Mercury Can't Hang On To Beat Tough Seattle Storm
The Phoenix Mercury and Seattle Storm hooked up for an early season battle of undefeated Western Conference contenders. Behind 25 points from Lauren Jackson and a whooping 24 turnovers for the Mercury, the Storm finished strong to secure a 95-89 overtime win.
The Mercury had all week to try and get their offensive chemistry together but those 24 turnovers (7 from Dupree and 6 from Taurasi) didn't reflect well on their work. You have to credit the Storm defenders for being very active defensively and slapping at the ball in the lane.
Coach Gaines and the Mercury of course, think that the turnover problem (they had 22 against the Sparks last week) is an issue that they have to own and correct.
"Right now we are kind of hesitant and not really in sync and it shows. Two games with twenty turnovers, that's really uncharacteristic of our team. So we're just going to have to get better," Taurasi explained.
The reigning MVP went 4 for 16 from the field and had no real answer for her second straight poor shooting performance but called that the least of her worries.
Candice Dupree finished with 14 points and 6 rebounds to go along with her 7 turnovers.
Storm Coach Brian Agler explains his team's defensive strategy against Dupree in the post, "They're so good, if you do it like in an organizational way they will find the open people. So you almost have to convince your team that you've got to jab at them and change things up and do some things that way and not really be consistent on how you send the help."
Agler obviously also had the luxury of Lauren Jackson to defend the rim. LJ finished with two blocks and four steals.
The Mercury kept the game within striking distance for most of the second half until a 12-4 run for the Storm gave the visitors an 11-point lead with about 4 minutes to go. Phoenix was able to fight back and eventually tie the game despite both teams blowing late chances to prevent an over time period.
Camille Little inexplicably passed up a wide open layup and ended up passing to no one and then was called for traveling when she went and retrieved the ball. On the other end, the Mercury weren't able to get Penny Taylor a clean look on a designed play and missed an open shot on a kick out only to have the ball fall to Bonner who instead of calling a time out with 6 seconds left heaved a shot from the sitting position.
Those final 60 seconds were not what you would call championship late game execution by either team including the Storm coach who was called for a technical with 23 seconds to go and his team up by one point.
In over time, it was the Storm who were able to get their act together and pull away behind veteran Swin Cash's 7 points.
The bright spot for the Mercury was DeWanna Bonner who continues to look very much like the player who won Sixth Women of the Year in 2009 - but better. Playing the wing gives her more opportunities to attack off the dribble where she can use her size, footwork and a newly developed cross-over to create a variety of shots and draw fouls.
Bonner posted an impressive career high 24 points on 7 of 12 shot attempts and a career high 12 rebounds.
Coach Agler had no answer for her, "She really played great tonight. We thought we were prepared for it but we couldn't get her shut down....We will definitely have to re-think our philosophy on guarding her."
The Storm look like a very strong team with a healthy Lauren Jackson doing her thing on both ends of the floor and a much improved bench that Coach Agler was more than willing to use as he played all eleven of his players.
Rebounding, an area that Coach Gaines hoped to improve this season, was still an issue against the Storm who out-worked Phoenix on the glass and finished with 18 offensive rebounds to only 8 for Phoenix.
The combination of rebounding and turnovers gave the Storm 94 shot attempts to only 66 for the Mercury. The Mercury only were able to stay in the game at all because the Storm missed a ton of shots (4 for 24 from three).
Post Game Audio:
Game Notes
1st Qtr
- Tangela Smith starts on LJ. Guess who gets good post position and draws an early foul
- LJ on Dupree on the other end and guess who scores a nice little jump hook over the big Aussie
- Corey Gaines is right in front of my calling for drags ever time the Mercury advance the ball but Taurasi and Meek ignoring him and can calling the audible
- Hand down, girl down. Penny just watched Swin shoot right over her. That time she contested Little's shot and the result was a miss. See how that works. Proof positive
- DT hitting shots tonight which is nice because I was a bit worried about that hand
- 5 turnovers for the Merc so far. 4 of them Storm steals and that's really the reason Seattle is up 20-12. Both teams shooting close to 60%
- Liking how Dupree runs right to the rim and the Merc find her in early offense
- DB with a long three? Wow
- 7 turnovers = 11 Seattle points. Make that 8 turnovers. Last two were just sloppy
- Seattle more than willing to run off Phoenix misses
- 26-21 Seattle
2nd Qtr
- Bonner looks really good
- Not sure why Smith is on LJ and not Ohlde
- More Merc turnovers leads to a very rare Corey Gaines time out
- Seattle is playing hard on defense but there's a lot of sloppy mistakes. Merc shooting 63% though so that will work
- Mercury playing a lot less zone so far
- Storm killing it on the offensive glass right now. 8 - 2 on the O-glass
- LJ looking very mobile on defense. I hope she can stay healthy this season
- Penny never looks like she's having much fun playing basketball
- Mercury switching quite a bit and Seattle taking advantage by going right at Taurasi w/ LeCoe
- Mercury very lucky to only be down 44-40. 12-2 second chance points. 17-3 points off turnovers. Of course, shooting 58% and 5 of 6 from three will keep you in a lot of games. Storm had 44 FGA's compared to only 26 for Merc
3rd Qtr
- Penny Taylor's shot is falling but her energy looks bad
- Storm slapping at a lot of balls and Mercury hoping for calls that aren't coming
- 9-0 run for Storm. Up 55-45
- Bonner drove hard, missed, grabbed her miss and got hammered hard by LJ
- 60-56 Storm. Be interesting to see if last years strategy of wearing teams down in the fourth works again this year
- Storm going deep into their bench. Clearly they understood what hurt them last year
- Mercury shooting came back to earth but fewer turnovers and good defense keeps it a 3 point game. 66-63. Only 1 turnover
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Max photos
Good article Seth, will Max be posting Mercury photos for this year? His photography is spectacular.
No
unfortunately, he’s decided not to work with us this year. We are looking for another photographer in Phoenix and in fact he asked me to remove this photo from last season
Blogging Suns Basketball . twitter: @sethpo
by Seth Pollack on May 23, 2010 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions
Mercury Meltdown
Admittedly it’s early in the season, but as a Mercury fan, I’m worried by what I see so far. A lot of the turnovers appear to be related to passing the ball into Candice Dupree, so that inside game isn’t working out as planned, and it slows the offense to a crawl. Penny Taylor with zero rebounds; she must not have been feeling too good. Diana Taurasi with back to back off-shooting nights, but she seems to be in denial about it. The Mercury seem to lack a go to player when Diana is off. Nicole Ohlde put in another lackluster performance; I’d rather see Brooke Smith out there. The bench depth that looked promising in the preseason has yet to make an appearance. It seemed like there were a lot of loose balls where the Mercury stood and watched while the Storm went after them. The Mercury just got outworked and outhustled on defense.
This isn't a good team
Good collection of talent in the starting line-up? Yes. Good team? No.
Good teams don’t turn the ball over 46 times in two games. Good teams don’t have their second-best player taking fewer shots than the shot-happy 5-foot-3 PG. Good teams don’t force-feed a player who is ill-equipped to handle the top-end post talent. Good teams have a coach capable of adjusting to his personnel. Good teams have a reliable bench. Good teams have great players.
You’ll note that Phoenix doesn’t have any of that at the moment, especially that last bit. Diana Taurasi with a broken hand is not a great player. Penny Taylor without the basketball is not a great player. Candice Dupree, turnovers or not, is not a great player (she put up good numbers on a bad team, which is usually a dubious affair ). Same for Temeka Johnson. Maybe Bonner is a great player, but she’s stuck on the bench (perhaps by necessity—that bench is beyond awful without her on it). The great player that Phoenix really needs will be suiting up for her third game with the Liberty. You can’t just replace the best transition player in the league who, by the way, happens to be an Olympian, with a player who can’t even begin to tell you what the WNBA Playoffs feel like!
This team should be 0-2 right now, and the one team it luckily defeated is now 0-3…
Taylor and Dupree
Taylor has been top 10 in the league in PER for five different seasons and she’s 10th on the career list. She’s obviously no slouch on defense, and without her, Cappie may not know what the playoffs feel like, either (just kidding). I think she definitely qualifies as a great player.
Dupree may have put up good numbers on a bad team overall in Chicago, but when her team was healthy this past season (Fowles), she was putting up good numbers on a good team. At 0-3, it seems like the Sky certainly miss her.
I do agree, however, without Taurasi being her normal self, this team probably won’t be more than a fourth seed going into the playoffs.
You missed the point of my post
When Taylor doesn’t have the ball (getting quality shots or setting up others in the framework of the offense), she isn’t able to be a great player. She’s a great player who’s being forced to be a “good” player because the coach wants to run the offense through an injured player and an overrated one. With Taurasi injured and Dupree trying to out-produce Sara Lee, the Mercury has got to do a better job of making Taylor the go-to player. I’ve seen what she can do plenty. She needs more shots. That falls on the coach. So does 46 turnovers in two games, since those issues seem to be somewhat related.
I stand by what I’ve said re Dupree. Good player who isn’t “great”. Chicago is 0-3 for reasons other than her departure (mostly stemming from lack of PG and horrific defense, two areas that Dupree can’t address). I suppose it’ll take her getting steamrolled by every starting PF in this league for the point to sink in with folks. Will Plenette have her 2010 breakout game on Tuesday night?
If LA didn’t have Gillom coaching, Phoenix would need to be concerned. As such, they’re virtually locked into the playoffs as long as Taurasi at least makes a token appearance on the court. 50% of Taurasi is better than most players at 110%.
by just checkin on May 23, 2010 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions
I wouldn't be so harsh on Dupree at this point...
Her skillset can be very useful if she’s used as a player sort of hanging out on the wings for a players like Taurasi/Taylor to kick out to and she can get out in transition.
Here’s my thing: it’s two games. They’re 1-1… perhaps you can dismiss the “not enough practice time narrative”, but adjusting to life after Pondexter and replacing her with an almost opposite style of player is just going to take time….for Gaines and the players to figure out.
I have yet to see the Mercury even attempt to set her up to do the things she did well in Chicago… I’m not sure when/if that will come… but we’ll just have to wait a bit…
SwishAppeal.com, women's basketball...covered SBN-style... twitter: @qmccall3
Fair enough
But Chicago is running with the same point guard it ran with last season, yet the team was actually good last season when Fowles played. So far, that’s not the case.
Chicago was good last year?
Because I seem to remember them having a negative point differential early on despite having a winning record early in the season. They were more “lucky” than “good”.
Your definition of “good” and my definition of “good” must differ greatly.
by just checkin on May 23, 2010 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions
The negative point differential was the product of a number of blowouts.
We’re speaking of 24 games here, where the Sky went 15-9. 1-9 when Fowles didn’t play, so something was obviously different. Was luck only on the Sky’s side when Fowles elected to take the court?
by RP_45 on May 23, 2010 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
A number of blowouts?
My point still stands. Chicago wasn’t a good team at any point last season. Good teams don’t get blown out a number of times by bad ones (e.g. Connecticut 2009).
by just checkin on May 23, 2010 6:23 PM EDT up reply actions
And my point still stands. When Fowles played, Chicago was posting a .625 winning percentage.
Bottom line is this, Chicago would have been a playoff team had Fowles played even 85 percent of her teams’ games.
by RP_45 on May 23, 2010 7:54 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
"Chicago would have been a playoff team had Fowles played even 85 percent of her teams’ games."
I find it very difficult to dispute that claim…given that they ended the season in a 3-way for fourth with Fowles missing almost a third of the season…
SwishAppeal.com, women's basketball...covered SBN-style... twitter: @qmccall3
Post game audio added
The Gaines audio is only the second half of his Q&A due to an equipment malfunction
Blogging Suns Basketball . twitter: @sethpo

by 

















