"Answer to DeFord: Why we're likely not to notice a women's basketball team excel"
Marie Hardin, an associate professor of journalism and associate director of the Center for Sports Journalism at Penn State University, wrote the following today about why "we're generally not willing to support women in team sports":
"Team sports are usually contact sports, and that's the bigger issue, I think. Women in sports that involve varying degrees of contact -- from the individual sports of boxing and wrestling, to team sports such as basketball -- challenge traditional ideas about femininity. And that's why they don't get the media attention or public attention they might otherwise deserve."
It's an interesting contrast to the attention given to physical play in women's basketball and the suggestion that increased physicality could in fact increase interest in the game.
Which brings us back to the question: is increasingly physical play good for women's basketball, especially if that poses a direct challenge to "traditional ideas about femininity?
Update from Helen at the Women's Hoops Blog: "physical contact might lead to physical intimacy."
5 months ago
Q McCall
5 comments
0 recs |
Comments
Pin-up vs. Warrior
Well, that is quite a notion, and could explain the dismissive attitude some males (and females) assume toward women in team sports. As a middle-aged straight woman with a college-aged daughter, I find the sight of Talia Caldwell leaping for a rebound inspiring rather than threatening. Clearly it’s disturbing to others, and rather than just saying, “Gosh, that disturbs me,” they retreat to their inner 14-year-olds and mumble, “Chicks are no good at team sports.” Yeah, right: Girls are yucky, girls have cooties.
Anyway, of course “increasingly physical play” is good for the game; apart from the excitement of physical play, it’s also inevitable, it’s change and growth and all that. Good grief, there was a time when women played half court and were restricted by actual rules about their moves. (Diana Taurasi would have been considered a freak, instead of an unusually strong and smart athlete.) “Traditional” femininity has become a construct used by advertisers; the real thing is more complex and more interesting.
(My big brother in Seattle loves basketball, and follows the Storm. For his 70th birthday, I sent a mock congratulatory e-mail from Lauren Jackson, and included the following link: http://olympicgirls.net/girls/basketball-girls/ The idea of game face coexisting with traditional feminine/sexy drag might bother some—it certainly bothered my sister-in-law!—but I wish more men and women could be this, , , perhaps “fluid” is the word.)
""Traditional" femininity has become a construct used by advertisers; the real thing is more complex and more interesting."
This is true…but it’s also reinforced in daily interactions by men and women alike… marketing and social norms are sort of mutually reinforcing in that regard, no?
Calming the inner 14-year-old is no small task though: as evidenced by the Olympic luge, putting boys and girls on equal fitting, even by accident is troubling for some people…
SwishAppeal.com, women's basketball...covered SBN-style... twitter: @qmccall3
“physical contact might lead to physical intimacy.”
hahaha what??
CGB: Wasting Your Potential, Your Time, & Your Life Since 2006.
Homophobia and women's sports...
An interesting extension of Hardin’s argument…but what do you think?
If femininity = heterosexuality in the minds of the inner-14-year-old, then physical contact could be a problem for some…
I just don’t see that as the primary factor, to be honest…
SwishAppeal.com, women's basketball...covered SBN-style... twitter: @qmccall3

















